CrimProf Blog

Editor: Kevin Cole
Univ. of San Diego School of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Tuesday, April 29, 2014

Baer on the Two Faces of Corporate Fraud

Baer_miriamMiriam H. Baer (Brooklyn Law School) has posted Confronting the Two Faces of Corporate Fraud (Florida Law Review, Vol. 66, No. 87, 2014) on SSRN. Here is the abstract:

Some criminals engage in meticulous planning. Others commit crimes in the heat of the moment. Corporate fraud incorporates both planned and spur-of-the-moment misconduct. Although law and economics scholars have traditionally viewed corporate fraud as a manifestation of opportunism among the corporation’s agents, a new generation of scholars, influenced by findings in behavioral psychology, has focused on the temporal aspects of corporate misconduct. Wrongdoing comes about, not simply because an agent opportunistically takes advantage of her principal, but also because her short-term self falls prey to temptations and cognitive biases that effectively disable her law-abiding long-term self. 



Although the law and economics and behavioral psychology accounts separately offer important lessons for observers of corporate fraud, neither theory addresses the regulatory implications confronting opportunistic behavior and temporal inconsistency at the same time. How can an internal corporate enforcer best respond to the “two faces” of corporate fraud? This Article explores this question, first by analyzing the interaction between the two dispositions, and then by considering the relative merits of various enforcement approaches.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/crimprof_blog/2014/04/baer-on-the-two-faces-of-corporate-fraud.html

| Permalink

Comments

Post a comment