CrimProf Blog

Editor: Kevin Cole
Univ. of San Diego School of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Wednesday, May 15, 2013

Meyn on Criminal Discovery

Meyn ionIon Meyn (University of Wisconsin Law School) has posted Discovery and Darkness: The Information Deficit in Criminal Disputes (Brooklyn Law Review , Forthcoming) on SSRN. Here is the abstract:

Scholarship has long recognized a disparity between the discovery rights afforded to civil litigants and those afforded to criminal defendants. The consensus is that this disparity is caused by resource constraints and limited access to the prosecutorial file. This Article challenges that conception, contending that criminal defendants are in fact structurally precluded from conducting any formal investigation. Merely entitled to disclosures of the State's evidence, a criminal defendant must rely on the fruits of the opponent's investigation to somehow suggest a counter-narrative. This dynamic is inconsistent with the design of the adversarial system and results in a failure to engage in adequate pretrial testing. This Article recasts a criminal defendant as an essential party to a criminal investigation who should have the pretrial power to compel information from multiple sources.

Certainly, greater access to the prosecutorial file and more resources will mitigate discovery deprivations that currently plague criminal defendants. But without extending a criminal defendant the power to direct an independent and formal investigation, adequate pretrial testing cannot occur. Evaluating the investigative tools that should be extended to a criminal defendant, the Article utilizes a case study to ascertain how the application of these tools might affect a pretrial investigation. Finally, the Article surveys and responds to policy arguments against permitting the participation of criminal defendants in criminal investigations.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/crimprof_blog/2013/05/meyn-on-criminal-discovery.html

| Permalink

Comments

I agree completely. As a criminal defense attorney I always come up against Judges and prosecutors who believe once the police investigation is done there should be no more investigation for more evidence. However, with the other side of their mouth they call this an "adversarial" system created to find the truth.

Posted by: Jesse Thomas | May 15, 2013 5:18:12 PM

Post a comment