CrimProf Blog

Editor: Kevin Cole
Univ. of San Diego School of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Thursday, November 8, 2012

DeGirolami on Sir James Fitzjames Stephen

DeGirolami MarcMarc O. DeGirolami (St. John's University School of Law) has posted The Punishment Jurist (Foundational Texts in Modern Criminal Law, Markus Dubber, ed., Oxford University Press (Forthcoming)) on SSRN. Here is the abstract:

This is an essay on the critical history of the thought of the Victorian-era judge, Sir James Fitzjames Stephen. It discusses some of the themes in his major work, "The History of the Criminal Law of England." And it reflects on a cluster of questions involving criminal punishment: whether Stephen had a "theory" of punishment; if not how best to characterize his thought; and whether his views and understanding of the aims and functions of punishment remain relevant. The essay explores Stephen's positive and critical contributions, and it concludes that Stephen's major insight was methodological. His view is that the reasons for punishment cannot be separated from the obligations and the nature of the judicial office. He was neither a punishment retributivist nor a punishment consequentialist, but a punishment jurist.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/crimprof_blog/2012/11/degirolami-on-sir-james-fitzjames-stephen.html

| Permalink

Comments

Post a comment