CrimProf Blog

Editor: Kevin Cole
Univ. of San Diego School of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Thursday, September 27, 2012

Avraham & Statman on the Comparative Nature of Desert

Avraham_ronenRonen Avraham (pictured) and Daniel Statman (University of Texas at Austin - School of Law and University of Haifa - Department of Philosophy) have posted More on the Comparative Nature of Desert: Can a Deserved Punishment Be Unjust? on SSRN. Here is the abstract:

Adam and Eve have the same record yet receive different punishment. Adam receives the punishment that they both deserve, whereas Eve receives a more lenient punishment. In this paper, we explore whether a deserved-but-unequal punishment, such as what Adam receives, can be just. We do this by explicating the conceptions of retributive justice that underlie both sides of the debate. We argue that inequality in punishment is disturbing mainly because of the disrespect it often expresses towards the offender receiving the harsher treatment, and also because it casts doubt on whether Adam got what he deserved. We suggest that when no disrespect is involved and when it is clear that the criminal got what he deserved, inequality is not worrisome.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/crimprof_blog/2012/09/avraham-statman-on-the-comparative-nature-of-desert.html

| Permalink

Comments

Post a comment