CrimProf Blog

Editor: Kevin Cole
Univ. of San Diego School of Law

Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Gazal-Ayal, Turjeman & Fishman on Sentencing Guidelines and Prosecutorial Power

Oren Gazal-Ayal Hagit Turjeman and Gideon Fishman (University of Haifa - Faculty of Law , University of Haifa - Department of Sociology & Anthropology and University of Haifa - Department of Sociology & Anthropology) have posted Do Sentencing Guidelines Increase Prosecutorial Power? – An Empirical Study (Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 76, No. 1, 2012) on SSRN. Here is the abstract:

Sentencing guidelines have been enacted across the United States and are currently being considered in other countries, including Israel. However, researchers argue that the new sentencing structures shift too much power to prosecutors. A unique set of data from Israel allows for a controlled examination of sentencing outcomes for people accused of aiding illegal aliens during three time periods: before the imposition of strict judicial sentencing guidelines, after this change was made, and then following the court’s mitigation of those guidelines. We find that prosecutors did not gain direct sentencing power from the guidelines. In fact, judges were often willing to depart from the guidelines even when prosecutors asked them to follow them. The guidelines might have had an effect on defendants, leading them to believe that they better plea bargain with the prosecutors. But when defendants did not bargain, they, in most cases, managed to convince the court not to follow the harsh guideline, even if prosecutors objected to the departure. It seems that judges, more than prosecutors, are willing to depart from harsh guidelines even when they are supposed to be bound by them. Hence we did not find support to the transfer of sentencing power theory.

| Permalink


The sentencing guidelines are important inasmuch as the same provide objectivity and transparency. One issue that our DUI lawyers in Pittsburgh see is, clients cannot understand the sentencing score sheet in cases where they are not offered ARD. The score sheet is extremely complicated in terms of how prior charges and other events come into play. Our Pittsburgh drunk driving attorneys would like to see greater transparency and perhaps an objective chart or universal system of how these score sheets are prepared and are to be read. A defend facing possible prison time for his second or third DUI really strugges to interpret the standard score sheet that lists prior crimes or charges.

Posted by: Pittsburgh DUI Lawyers | Jun 13, 2012 6:23:46 AM

Post a comment