Monday, May 21, 2012
Issue summary is from ScotusBlog, which also links to papers:
- Clapper, et al., v. Amnesty International, et al.: Whether respondents lack Article III standing to seek prospective relief because they proffered no evidence that the United States would imminently acquire their international communications using 50 U.S.C. 1881a-authorized surveillance and did not show that an injunction prohibiting Section 1881a-authorized surveillance would likely redress their purported injuries.