CrimProf Blog

Editor: Kevin Cole
Univ. of San Diego School of Law

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

Garoupa & Echazu on Loser-Pays in Criminal Litigation

Garoupa nunoNuno M. Garoupa (pictured) and Luciana Echazu (University of Illinois College of Law and Clarkson University) has posted Why Not Adopt a Loser-Pays-All Rule in Criminal Litigation? (International Review of Law and Economics, 2012) on SSRN. Here is the abstract:

In this paper we consider the potential effects that the application of a loser-pays-all rule may have on criminal litigation, including the decision to prosecute, criminal deterrence and legal error. We find that the effects of fee shifting on deterrence and on miscarriage of justice go in opposite directions. We also look at the effects of this rule on the rate of settlements (plea-bargaining) and when one party is wealth-constrained. We apply the insights of our model to current policy discussions such as the use of RICO proceedings and the financing of enforcement authorities in the United States.

| Permalink


Thanks for looking into the financial aspects as well. As you know, not everyone can afford the expert services of a good lawyer.

Posted by: Coeur d'Alene Civil Litigator | Apr 23, 2012 11:32:16 PM

Post a comment