CrimProf Blog

Editor: Kevin Cole
Univ. of San Diego School of Law

Friday, July 22, 2011

McDonald & Tinsley on Alternative Ways of Giving Evidence by Vulnerable Victims

Mcdonald elisabeth Elisabeth McDonald (pictured) and Yvette Tinsley (Victoria University of Wellington - Faculty of Law and Victoria University of Wellington - Faculty of Law) have posted
Use of Alternative Ways of Giving Evidence by Vulnerable Witnesses: Current Proposals, Issues and Challenges (Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. Here is the abstract:

Fifteen years after the Law Commission’s rejection of pre-trial recording of cross-examination, it is back on the reform agenda. Drawing from research examining comparative pre-trial and trial practices in cases of sexual offending, this article discusses the backdrop to the debate surrounding pre-recording, including the provisions of the Evidence Act 2006 and the approach of the courts to alternative ways of giving evidence. The benefits and drawbacks of pre-trial recording of evidence for adult witnesses are canvassed – including practical, evidential and psychological issues – leading to the conclusion that rather than a presumption in favour of any particular alternative way of giving evidence, close consideration of the individual circumstances of each case is required.

| Permalink


I think this is a great step taken by McDonald & Tinsley. Thank you for this news and nice post.

Posted by: Michel Scofield | Jul 24, 2011 11:37:12 AM

Post a comment