CrimProf Blog

Editor: Kevin Cole
Univ. of San Diego School of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Wednesday, December 22, 2010

Joy on Safeguards Against Informant Perjury

Joy peter Peter A. Joy (Washington University School of Law) has posted Constructing Systemic Safeguards Against Informant Perjury (Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, Vol. 7, p. 677, 2010) on SSRN. Here is the abstract:

Reliance on an informant's testimony as the primary basis for charging and convicting the accused is fraught with problems. While the hypothetical explicitly addresses the ethical dilemmas defense counsel faces when her client is trading false testimony in exchange for a reduced charge and shorter sentence, the hypothetical also implicitly illustrates the inadequacies of our criminal justice system's current handling of testimony from cooperating witnesses.



The focus on the ethical, and perhaps moral, obligations of Lawyer representing a potentially perjurious Client begs larger questions. Are there safeguards the prosecutor's office could employ to ensure that the trial prosecutor, who is focused on convicting Kingpin, has not been manipulated by Client or has not consciously or unconsciously supplied the facts necessary for Client to manufacture the testimony required to convict Kingpin? What criminal justice reforms would help to prevent or discredit such perjury and make a wrongful conviction less likely? These are some of the additional questions we should be exploring. In my comment, I first illustrate why focusing solely on defense counsel ethics is not wholly sufficient and next briefly discuss some criminal justice system reforms that would better safeguard the accused.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/crimprof_blog/2010/12/joy-on-safeguards-against-informant-perjury.html

| Permalink

Comments

Thanks v much for posting - many similar issues arising in terms of criminal law and practice in Scotland also. Last week, for instance, there was an example of a man, Tommy Sheridan, who won a defamation/libel action against a major news network only to be found guilty of perjury by a Scottish jury of 15 people. Obviously causing much controversy amongst the legal profession here.

Looking forward to further posts. Best wishes, Beltrami Solicitors Criminal Defence Lawyers Glasgow

Posted by: Criminal Lawyers Glasgow | Dec 29, 2010 8:48:42 AM

Perjury is lying under oath, usually in a court of law, but also under certain other specific circumstances, such as testifying before Congress. Indictments for perjury are often paired with obstruction of justice, at least in the US, since the process of lying under oath almost by definition obstructs the course of justice in a case.

Posted by: Investigation Services | Jan 29, 2011 11:05:27 PM

Post a comment