CrimProf Blog

Editor: Kevin Cole
Univ. of San Diego School of Law

Sunday, December 6, 2009

Fenner on Today's Confrontation Clause

Fenner michael G. Michael Fenner  (Creighton University School of Law) has posted Today's Confrontation Clause (After Crawford and Melendez-Diaz) on SSRN. Here is the abstract:

In the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, the Confrontation Clause states that, “[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right . . . to be confronted with the witnesses against him.” In recent years the Supreme Court of the United States’s understanding of the meaning of this Clause may well be the single part of constitutional law - certainly of criminal procedure - that has undergone the most radical change.

This Article is about this sharp turn in the law of the Confrontation Clause. After a brief discussion of the history of the Court’s understanding of the Clause, the Article settles into a discussion of its new understanding, as found primarily in the Court’s opinion in 2004’s Crawford v. Washington and its 2009 opinion in Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts - a discussion of where the Court’s understanding sits today and where it may be headed. Throughout, the Article deals with the details of the coverage of the Confrontation Clause - when the right attaches and what the Clause requires when the right does attach.

Continue reading

December 6, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (0)

Top-Ten Recent SSRN Downloads

Ssrn logo are here. The usual disclaimers apply.

Rank Downloads Paper Title
1 296 The Emerging Criminal War on Sex Offenders
Corey Rayburn Yung,
The John Marshall Law School,
Date posted to database: August 18, 2009
2 276 The Increased Level of EU Antitrust Fines, Judicial Review, and the European Convention on Human Rights
Wouter P. J. Wils,
European Commission Legal Service,
Date posted to database: October 24, 2009 [4th last week]
3 271 Blaming the Brain
Steven K. Erickson,
University of Missouri at Columbia - School of Law,
Date posted to database: September 12, 2009 [2nd last week] 
4 248 The Torture Lawyers
Jens David Ohlin,
Cornell Law School,
Date posted to database: September 10, 2009 [3rd last week] 
5 190 Can Bad Science Be Good Evidence: Lie Detection, Neuroscience, and the Mistaken Conflation of Legal and Scientific Norms
Frederick Schauer,
University of Virginia School of Law,
Date posted to database: August 13, 2009
6 152 The Experiential Future of the Law
Adam J. Kolber,
University of San Diego School of Law,
Date posted to database: October 13, 2009 [7th last week] 
7 149 Incarceration American-Style
Sharon Dolovich,
University of California, Los Angeles - School of Law,
Date posted to database: October 13, 2009 [8th last week]
8 117 Henry Louis Gates and Racial Profiling: What's the Problem?
Bernard E. Harcourt,
University of Chicago - Law School,
Date posted to database: September 21, 2009 [new to top ten] 
9 117 The Crime of Conviction of John Choon Yoo: The Actual Criminality in the OLC During the Bush Administration
Joseph Lavitt,
University of California, Berkeley - School of Law,
Date posted to database: September 23, 2009 [new to top ten] 
10 115 Unlawful Killing with Combat Drones: A Case Study of Pakistan, 2004-2009
Mary Ellen O'Connell,
Notre Dame Law School ,
Date posted to database: November 6, 2009 [new to top ten]

December 6, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (0)