October 18, 2009
Starr on Sentencing Reductions for Prosecutorial Misconduct
Sonja B. Starr (University of Michigan Law School) has published Sentence Reduction as a Remedy for Prosecutorial Misconduct in the Georgetown Law Journal. Here is the abstract:
Current remedies for prosecutorial misconduct, such as reversal of conviction or dismissal of charges, are rarely granted by courts and thus do not deter prosecutors effectively. Further, such all-or-nothing remedial schemes are often problematic from corrective and expressive perspectives, especially when misconduct has not affected the trial verdict. When granted, these remedies produce windfalls to guilty defendants and provoke public resentment, undermining their expressive value in condemning misconduct. To avoid these windfalls, courts refuse to grant any remedy at all, either refusing to recognize violations or deeming them harmless. This often leaves significant non-conviction-related harms unremedied and egregious prosecutorial misconduct uncondemned and undeterred.
This Article proposes adding sentence reduction to current remedial schemes, arguing that this would provide courts with an intermediate remedy that they would be more willing to grant. The Article demonstrates that several prosecutorial incentives combine to make sentence reduction an effective deterrent. Moreover, because sentence reduction could be tailored to the magnitude of the violation, it could resolve the windfall dilemma and serve as an effective corrective and expressive remedy.
October 18, 2009 | Permalink
Please let me know what it will take to remove the absolute immunity that assistant district attorneys enjoy as they comitt crimes in order to gain convictions?
Posted by: NoMoreNolocontendere | Nov 3, 2009 8:03:46 AM
sentence reduction is good anyway.
Posted by: bon de reduction | Mar 5, 2010 7:52:49 PM