CrimProf Blog

Editor: Kevin Cole
Univ. of San Diego School of Law

Monday, June 11, 2007

SCOTUS Grants Review To Discuss Deviation From US Sentencing Guidelines

Supreme_court_20The U.S. Supreme Court June 11 granted review in a criminal case that raises a sentencing issue similar to that presented in a case that the court dropped last week due to the death of the petitioner.

The question presented in Gall v. United States, No. 06-7949, is as follows: When determining the "reasonableness" of a district court sentence under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 76 CrL 251 (2005), is it appropriate to require district courts to justify a deviation from the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines with a finding of extraordinary circumstances?

The court also agreed to review a case involving federal sentencing judges' authority to impose a sentence below the guidelines range on the basis of a disagreement with the guidelines' disparate treatment of crack and powder cocaine offenses,  Kimbrough v. United States, No. 06-6330.

[Mark Godsey]

Supreme Court | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference SCOTUS Grants Review To Discuss Deviation From US Sentencing Guidelines:


Post a comment