CrimProf Blog

Editor: Kevin Cole
Univ. of San Diego School of Law

Friday, June 22, 2007

SCOTUS Decides Rita v US

Supreme_court_20In Rita v. United States, No. 06-5754, the SCOTUS ruled that federal appeals courts may apply a "presumption of reasonableness" to federal sentences that fall within the range of punishment recommended by the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. Critics of this approach had argued that such a presumption effectively moved the guidelines system back toward the mandatory guidelines scheme that the court struck down in United States v. Booker [Mark Godsey]

Supreme Court | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference SCOTUS Decides Rita v US:


Post a comment