CrimProf Blog

Editor: Kevin Cole
Univ. of San Diego School of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Sunday, March 25, 2007

CrimProf Janine Benedet Explains Monetary Compensation is Unlikely for Acquitted Jet Crash Defendant

Benedet_res2From earthtimes.com: The chances of success of Ripudaman Singh Malik, one of the two Sikhs acquitted in the 1985 Air India jumbo jet crash case, in his suits against the Canadian government as well as that of British Columbia for malicious prosecution are extremely low, experts, such as University of British Columbia CrimProf Janine Benedet, said.

'It's possible, but it requires not just that you were tried and found not guilty and suffered damages,' CrimProf Janine Benedet was quoted as saying by the Globe and Mail newspaper.

Singh and co-accused Ajaib Singh Bagri were arrested in October 2000, 15 years after Air India flight 182 crashed off the coast of Ireland, killing all 329 passengers and crew. He spent approximately four years in jail and millions of dollars defending himself in the case.

'Defendants who are acquitted are not ordinarily entitled to damages, even though they spent time in jail and may have suffered personally. Showing that evidence was fabricated would not be enough,' CrimProf Benedet said. 'The court would also require evidence of an improper purpose,' she added. Rest of Article. . . [Mark Godsey]

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/crimprof_blog/2007/03/crimprof_janine.html

CrimProfs | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00d83542b23353ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference CrimProf Janine Benedet Explains Monetary Compensation is Unlikely for Acquitted Jet Crash Defendant:

Comments

Post a comment