Saturday, November 25, 2006
From philly.com: Nothing says Christmas quite like a glittery black handgun hanging from the tree.
Urban Outfitters Inc. - no stranger to controversial products - is offering the 5-inch-long, Chinese-made gun ornament for $6 in its stores and catalogs this year.
"Bust a cap in your tree with this superglittery ornament in the shape of a handgun, complete with a satin ribbon for hanging," the online description of the revolver says. It is meant, the retailer says, as an "ironic twist" on the holidays.
"Twisted" is more like it, said Kate Philips, Gov. Rendell's spokeswoman. "The governor doesn't find it humorous or clever to display weapons that are responsible for taking hundreds of lives each year as if they are decorations," she said. Rest of Article. . . [Mark Godsey]
Friday, November 24, 2006
This week, the CrimProf Blog spotlights Barry University Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law CrimProf Leonard E. Birdsong.
Professor Birdsong teaches Criminal Law, White Collar Crime, Evidence, Federal Jurisdiction, and Immigration Law. He received his Juris Doctor degree from the Harvard Law School in Cambridge, Massachusetts in 1973.
Immediately after law school, he was an attorney with the law firm of Baker & Hostetler. Later he served as a diplomat with the State Department with various postings in Nigeria, Germany, and the Bahamas. Professor Birdsong also worked as a federal prosecutor, first as an Assistant United States Attorney for the District of Columbia, and later as a Special Assistant United States Attorney for the U.S. Virgin Islands.
After leaving government service, Professor Birdsong was in private practice in Washington, D.C., where he specialized in trial work ranging from criminal defense work to political asylum matters. While in private practice, Professor Birdsong was also involved with broadcast work. He has done on-air TV legal analysis work for Fox News, CNN, Court TV, BET TV News, and for W*USA Channel 9 in Washington, D.C.
During this same period, he also produced and hosted several radio talk programs in the Washington, D.C., and Baltimore areas. Currently, Professor Birdsong is occasionally invited to appear as a legal commentator on Fox News and MSNBC. [Mark Godsey]
Thursday, November 23, 2006
From NYTimes.com: New York’s top judicial officials outlined a plan on Tuesday to begin reforming the state’s 300-year-old system of town and village courts, which have been criticized for decades as outmoded, poorly supervised and unfair.
The plan, announced here by the state’s chief judge, Judith S. Kaye, included changes that have been recommended for years by defense lawyers and legal experts. Among them were plans to increase training for the justices, to improve their supervision and to better monitor whether they are protecting basic legal principles like the constitutional right to a lawyer.
The courts — known as justice courts — are also to be required for the first time to keep a word-for-word record of their proceedings, like other courts in the state.
While the officials said that many town and village justices are diligent, Judge Kaye said a sweeping reform program was called for by what she called enduring concerns about the courts. The system has survived a century of calls for radical overhaul by governors and commissions, and an important legal challenge in the 1980s. Rest of Article. . . [Mark Godsey]
From NYTimes.com: New York's highest court yesterday struck down the Pataki administration’s practice of confining sex offenders in psychiatric hospitals after their prison terms end and ordered immediate hearings to determine whether those being held should be released.
The 7-0 decision by the state Court of Appeals was a sharp rebuke to Gov. George E. Pataki, who last year ordered the confinement of 12 sex offenders after lawmakers failed to agree on legislation that would have explicitly permitted such detention.
In yesterday’s ruling, the court found that the state erred in using mental hygiene laws to confine the 12 men, 11 of whom are still held involuntarily at psychiatric hospitals in New York City. The men had legal protections as prisoners that entitled them to hearings before being ordered confined upon their release, the court found.
“These people were characterized as being free citizens. The fact is that they were prisoners, and were entitled to the protections built into the correction law before they can be sent from prison to a psychiatric hospital,” said Stephen J. Harkavy of Mental Hygiene Legal Service, a state agency that represented the 12 men. Rest of Article. . . [Mark Godsey]
Wednesday, November 22, 2006
From latimes.com: The state Legislature should limit the use of testimony by jailhouse informants in criminal trials, according to the latest report issued by a blue ribbon commission examining problems of wrongful convictions in California.
The California Commission on the Fair Administration of Justice said lawmakers should enact a statute barring convictions based on the testimony of an in-custody informant, unless the account is corroborated by independent evidence.
Similar corroboration should also be required for jailhouse informant testimony presented in the penalty phase of a capital murder case, according to the 20-member commission, which is chaired by former California Atty. Gen. John Van de Kamp.
The recommended controls, if adopted, would parallel current state law mandating corroboration if testimony by a defendant's accomplices is to be introduced.
Jailhouse informants have been implicated in a number of wrongful convictions, including 46% of those reviewed in a study by professors at Northwestern University Law School, the report noted. Critics say it is all too easy for informants to gather information about their fellow inmates' charges and fabricate testimony to persuade prosecutors to offer them leniency on their cases.
Of the 117 death penalty appeals pending in the state public defender's office, 17 featured testimony by in-custody informants and six included testimony by informants out on bail or otherwise in "constructive custody."
Consequently, the commission said "confidence in the reliability of testimony of arrested or charged informant witnesses is a matter of continuing concern to ensure that the administration of justice in California is just, fair and accurate." Rest of Article. . . [Mark Godsey]
From SignOnSanDiego.com: UCLA Law CrimProf and prison expert Sharon Dolovich recently stated that California should lower its population of inmates through key reforms, instead of shipping them out of the state.
Faced with packed prisons, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is transferring inmates to out-of-state facilities for the first time. About 2,200 inmates, all volunteers, will be moved to private, medium-security prisons in four states, including the Florence Correctional Center in Arizona.
“The assumption of this move is that there's nothing else California can do,” she said. “But in fact we have a lot of people incarcerated who shouldn't be incarcerated.” Dolovich stated.
Like Romero other critics, Dolovich believes California's parole and sentencing policies are overly stringent. She studies both private and public prisons. She says one type is not necessarily better than the other, and that both operate under financial pressures and often lack adequate oversight.
Rest of Article. . . [Mark Godsey]
From NPR.com: A young woman who says polygamist leader Warren Jeffs forced her to marry -- and have sex -- at age 14 offered dramatic testimony Tuesday in a courtroom in St. George, Utah.
Jeffs is the leader of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, or FLDS Church. He's charged in Utah with two counts of "rape as an accomplice."
Tuesday's hearing was to determine whether the case will go to trial. It was the first time that Jeffs faced his accuser, the young woman who is the primary witness against him. She was 14, she told the court, when Jeffs ordered her into a "spiritual marriage" with her first cousin, a 19-year-old at the time, and then forced her to have sex with him. Such marriages are not legally recognized. Jeffs allegedly told the woman her salvation depended on her compliance.
In court, the young woman sobbed, cried and dabbed at tears as Jess watched her dispassionately. She described learning of her spiritual marriage, and said she was horrified and resisted. She also described the horror of her husband trying to consummate their marriage, which eventually he did.
Listen. . . [Mark Godsey]
In England, senior police officer, Howard Roberts, urged the UK to follow Holland and Switzerland's lead and begin the state-funded (NHS-funded) prescription of heroin to addicts, in efforts to treat them and reduce crime. The program would cost £12,000 a year for each addict to be treated this way, but proponents believe the treatment would be cost-effective in the long run because users steal at least £45,000 worth of property a year to feed their addictions. Widespread trials of such programs in Holland and Switzerland show users turning away from crime to feed their habits when they were prescribed drugs. Story from IndependentOnline. Meanwhile, here in the U.S., debate continues (here and here) over Louisiana's controversial "heroin lifers" case. [Michele Berry]
Seven dimwitted teenage thieves have been arrested and charged after they posted pictures of themselves on MySpace, posing with thousands of dollars worth of stolen jewelry, laptops, firearms, and televisions. Now the only pics they're posing for are mug shots. Story. . . [Michele Berry]
Nine New Orleans criminal court judges have ordered the board overseeing the city's indigent defense system to hire more full-time public defenders. The order, issued on Monday by judges with the Criminal District Court, said mismanagement of the Orleans Parish Indigent Defender Program has effectively denied poor defendants their 6th Amendment right to proper legal representation. Under the order, the public defenders office must hire an additional attorney for each section of court by December 1. Currently, there is just one attorney in each of the 12 courtrooms. The office also must give the judges a list of all capital cases and the attorneys assigned to those cases.
While most consider the court order a postive, several judges have been critical of a decision to make the program's lawyers work full time instead of maintaining a side-line practice. Critics argue that the sudden switch to full-time lawyers pushed out a handful of veteran attorneys at a time when they were needed. Critics also question why the indigent defense board has hired prominent, out-of-state lawyers, including Yale CrimProf Ronald Sullivan Jr., former head of Washington D.C.'s public defender office, to redesign the office, train and recruit new public defenders, when in-state lawyers would have cost less.
Many counter the criticism with the old saying, "it's a much-needed, long-term investment." Story from KATC.com. . . [Michele Berry]
Fa la la la la, la la la la. Beginning next week, the Los Angeles Police Department will begin installing digital video cameras in some patrol cars to better track how arrests are made. Arrest tactics have been an issue under scrutiny since the recent surfacing of two amateur videos, shot by passers-by, documented forceful tactics by officers. Officials hope to install cameras in most of the 300 patrol cars in that bureau by the end of next year, with the goal of expanding to the rest of the force over the next three years. As of Monday, the LA City Council approved $5 million for the cameras. Story from washingtonpost.com. . . [Michele Berry]
Tuesday, November 21, 2006
From latimes.com: For 25 minutes Monday, a judge attacked George Russell Weller's "enormous indifference" and "unbelievable callousness" in running down and killing 10 pedestrians in a Santa Monica open-air market. The 89-year-old deserved prison for his crime, the judge said. But in the end, Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Michael Johnson placed Weller on probation, finding that his age and poor health undercut any value to imprisonment.
"Mr. Weller deserves to go to prison, but because of and only because of his rapidly declining health, I will place him on probation," Johnson said in a withering critique of Weller's behavior during and after the 2003 crash.
The toll from Weller's 20-second drive through the Santa Monica Farmers' Market on July 16, 2003 — 78 people killed or injured — included the highest number of pedestrian fatalities from a traffic accident in California history.
"It's not closure for me," said Lily Hoffman, whose 78-year-old father, Movsha, died in the crash. Her mother, Esther, now 77, who was at his side, was seriously injured. "I'm not satisfied at all." Weller "was grossly negligent. This trial accomplished nothing." Rest of Article. . . [Mark Godsey]
From newsday.com: Men pay to make it grow. Women spend lavishly to dye, cut and coordinate it with their wardrobe. But these days, hair isn't just a key accessory to looking good.
It also can give government agencies a way to determine who might be abusing drugs in the workplace. Currently, the federal government is reviewing whether to expand its existing employee drug-testing guidelines to include analyzing hair for evidence of illicit drug use.
As screening methods for hair, saliva and sweat have improved in recent years, there has been a long-running and often contentious debate over whether these should be added to the current gold standard, the urine test.
Forensic experts agree there are benefits to both urine and hair analysis. Although urine testing can find traces of a drug for about five days after being ingested, trace amounts of a chemical substance entrapped in the cortex of a hair strand can be found up to three months later.
But in July, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration abruptly backed away from a proposal that would allow federal agencies the leeway to include saliva, sweat and hair testing along with urine tests, officials said.
Rest of Article. . . [Mark Godsey]
From enquirer.com: Charges against a former Hamilton, OH city prosecutor accused of naked after-hours strolls in public buildings will be dropped because of a technicality, a special prosecutor said today.
Special Prosecutor Steve Tolbert said there was an error in the charges that will require dismissal of the case. It was not immediately clear if the charges will be refiled.
Former prosecutor Scott Blauvelt, 35, of Hamilton has pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity to two counts of public indecency.The charges stem from incidents in the city's Government Services Center on Oct. 4 and Oct. 5 that were caught on a security camera. Blauvelt worked in that building.
Blauvelt's lawyer, Mike Gmoser, has suggested that his client's behavior may be related to a mental illness, medication and/or a brain injury that resulted from a 2005 car wreck in which Blauvelt also had been naked.
More recently, Blauvelt told investigators he had been "doing similar things for about the past five years," but didn't know why -- and officials learned that he also had walked naked in the city building Sept. 25. Rest of Article. . . [Mark Godsey]
When should culture be taken into account in criminal prosecutions and to what extent? Though used sparingly, carving out cultural exceptions in drug laws is far from a novel concept. Not that long ago, SCOTUS allowed a small Brazil-based church in New Mexico to continue the use of hallucinogenic tea, which contains the illegal drug DMT. The Utah Supreme Court dealt with the question fairly recently, too, when it decided that a couple that started a religion using peyote for ritual shouldn't face federal drug charges.
This past week, in Wisconsin, Liban Moalin, 37, an Ethiopian-born Canadian citizen was convicted of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver, in what some people are calling a "culturally insensitive drug case." Moalin's conviction was based on his possession of khat, an evergreen shrub grown in East Africa and the Arabian peninsula and prized for its stimulating properties. For millennia, East Africans and Arabs have chewed the plant's leaves and stems as a stimulant. The Village Voice explains that khat is used the same way as the leafy version of chewing tobacco, balled into a side of a cheek. But the chewing lasts for hours and hours (usually some liquid— water, tea, or soda—is needed to ward off dry mouth) and the juice is swallowed, not spit out.
Moalin was arrested in January after he took delivery of a shipment of the plants from a friend in Italy. But the shipment had been intercepted by U.S. Customs agents, then was delivered to Moalin by a Madison police detective posing as a Federal Express employee. The jury rejected claims by Moalin's attorneys that he didn't know khat was an illegal drug because it is the active ingredient in khat--cathinone, and not the plant itself--that is listed as a controlled substance in state law. Assistant District Attorney Kenneth Farmer countered that marijuana itself isn't mentioned in statutes either, only its active ingredient, tetrahydrocannabinol is listed. But everyone still knows it's illegal to use or possess.
Increasingly, police are cracking down on khat in cities where there are concentrations of East African immigrants. These crack downs lead some to think that khat prosecutions represent a clash of cultures, aimed at targetting Muslims and finding legitimate, albeit pretextual, bases for deportations. Still, others ask, what's wrong with enforcing the laws of the land, regardless of the offender's cultural background? More on Khat from the Village Voice and the Moalin conviction from the Wisconsin State Journal [Michele Berry]
Prosecutors in New Mexico say they face a Catch-22 situation because of delays in receiving DNA results from the state crime lab. As prosecutors in New Mexico describe it--if they wait for the state crime lab to analyze DNA or other evidence before charging someone, they risk leaving someone who might be guilty on the street to commit other crimes. But, if they file charges and go to trial without lab evidence, a guilty person might be acquitted or an innocent person might be convicted.
"Effectively, we can't get DNA analysis. We're not exaggerating the problem...It has been a nightmare," District Attorney Scot Key of Alamogordo. In major cases, evidence is sent to private labs, but testing in a single cases easily can exceed $5,000. The crime lab has been backlogged for a decade, and now, each of the state's 19 forensic technicians would have to work 485 hours each just to handle what's backed up. Sounds like more effective and efficient processes need to be put in place for collecting and processing evidence and more qualified forensic scientists are needed.
On the other hand, as eager as prosecutors may be to test DNA at the outset of the investigation, post-conviction DNA testing is often another story. [Michele Berry]
A DNA match —a crime "solved" by the FBI's CODIS database — does not mean that an arrest was made, that a criminal was prosecuted, or even that detectives considered a case closed. So how many DNA matches lead to an arrest and how often is the ball dropped? Unknown, no government agency keeps track.
But a USA TODAY investigation found almost three dozen cases during the past five years in which investigators failed to pursue potential suspects whose DNA matched evidence found at crime scenes. DNA matches that could have closed cases weren't pursued because of basic police foul-ups, such as overlooking a telephone message reporting the match. According to USA TODAY, backlogs of unsolved "cold cases" that threaten to overwhelm some big-city police departments caused matches to be ignored. In some jurisdictions — Richmond, Va., Cincinnati, and DeKalb County, Ga. — police offered no explanations for why matches were not pursued.
Among the cases USA TODAY found:
•In Oakland, in June 2004, the DNA of convicted child molester Kalonji Lee matched DNA from an attempted sexual assault of a 10-year-old Oakland girl the previous January. Police did not contact Lee until after he had molested another Oakland 10-year-old in December 2004, deputy chief Howard Jordan confirms. Lee was caught for the second assault after the victim's parents spotted his picture on California's "Megan's Law" website and alerted detectives.
•In Cincinnati, September 2004, the DNA of career felon Gary Box matched DNA left at a December 2001 rape and abduction that Cincinnati police had been unable to solve. At the time of the match, Box was serving a prison sentence for assault. But police did not contact him until May 2005, after he had been released from prison and had returned to Cincinnati. Court files show that police acted after being alerted by Box's victim, who encountered him by chance while walking in a local park.
•In Georgia, March 2003, the DNA of convicted burglar and sex offender Floyd "Tony" Arnold matched DNA left at separate rapes in Fulton and DeKalb Counties. The rapes had taken place in 1993 and 1995. But neither Fulton nor DeKalb authorities contacted Arnold, according to both police departments, even though at the time of the matches he was in Georgia's prison system serving a five-year sentence for cruelty to children. The unpursued matches came to light last December, when Arnold was matched through a third DNA hit to a 1981 Cobb County rape for which another man had been wrongly convicted. That man, Robert Clark, Jr., had served almost 24 years in prison.
•In Oregon, 2002, the state police crime lab used DNA to match 26 men to unsolved Portland burglaries. The names were reported to Portland police, department spokesman Detective Paul Dolbey acknowledges. None was followed until one of the 26 suspects was matched again to an additional burglary, and lab technicians pointed out the earlier matches.
More from USA TODAY including some DNA success stories. . . [Michele Berry]
Monday, November 20, 2006
washingtonpost.com: If there is a "truth serum" that works, it is a secret that nobody is giving up.
The debate earlier this year on interrogation techniques in the war on terrorism raised anew a question that goes back at least 2,000 years. Is there something you can give a person that will make him tell the truth?
In the 21st century, however, the answer appears to be: No. There is no pharmaceutical compound today whose proven effect is the consistent or predictable enhancement of truth-telling.
For the record, spokesmen for the Army medical research command, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and the CIA say there is no work underway on truth serums.
Whether such a substance could ever be used legally is a question some legal scholars believe is still open. "In the United States, no law at either the state or national level makes the use of truth serum a crime per se," Jason R. Odeshoo wrote in the Stanford Law Review in 2004.
Information gotten through drug-aided interviews would not be allowed in a trial because of the Constitution's privilege against self-incrimination, but it might be legal to use truth serum "solely for intelligence-gathering purposes," he argued. Similarly, while the Geneva Conventions forbid its use against prisoners of war, if terrorism suspects aren't considered POWs the conventions wouldn't block it, he wrote. Rest of Article. . . [Mark Godsey]
From NPR.com: Los Angeles Police Chief William Bratton responds to another incident caught on tape that's creating problems for his department. The video shows an L.A.P.D. officer dousing a handcuffed suspect's face with pepper spray after the man is put into the back of a patrol car.
The department is already the target of an FBI probe prompted by another video.
That tape shows an officer repeatedly punching a suspect in the face after the man is down with the officer's knee in his throat. Sources have told reporters that the department's top officials are "livid" over these incidents. Listen. . . [Mark Godsey]
From courier-journal.com: A proposed ordinance banning sex offenders from Jeffersonville, Indiana's parks could be approved by the end of the year — but might face a court challenge to its constitutionality.
The ordinance would require that the estimated 60 Jeffersonville residents on the Indiana Sex Offender Registry be notified of its provisions. And signs would have to be posted at city parks saying that those on the registry are banned from entering.
Several members of the Jeffersonville City Council say they support the concept. But Ken Falk, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana, said he believes it could be challenged as a violation of the Indiana constitution, much as his organization is challenging similar ordinances in Indianapolis and Plainfield.
"People have a right to use public parks," Falk said, adding that the ACLU would represent anyone who wanted to challenge the ordinance, if enacted. Rest of Article. . . [Mark Godsey]