October 22, 2006
CrimProfs James Jacobs and Michael Cahill Speak About the Finality of Jury Deliberations
From newsday.com: New York University School of Law CrimProf James Jacobs and Brooklyn Law School CrimProf Michael Cahill both recently discussed the problems with former Jury Foreman Loy Malcomb's complaint that she was pressured into agreeing on a guilty verdict in Martin Heidgen murder trial.
CrimProf Cahill said recent state appellate decisions have found that the "tenor" of deliberations is not something that can be used to impeach a jury verdict. In one case, for example, several jurors were found to have threatened one of their peers into agreeing with them, and the appellate division still let the verdict stand, Cahill said.
"They're entitled to reach the conclusion they reached, and there's very little scrutiny of the process they used," Cahill said. Rest of Article. . . [Mark Godsey]
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference CrimProfs James Jacobs and Michael Cahill Speak About the Finality of Jury Deliberations: