CrimProf Blog

Editor: Kevin Cole
Univ. of San Diego School of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Saturday, August 19, 2006

CrimProf Lee Stuesser Discusses the Defendant Testimony Decision

Stuesser2From 680news.com: University of Manitoba CrimProf Lee Stuesser discusses the decision of whether or not to let a defendant testify with 680 News Radio.

The decision whether to testify depends in large part on the type of case it is, said Stuesser.

If it's a question of identity, whether the suspect was involved in the crime, there's often little to be gained by testifying since the onus is on the Crown to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. However, there are cases that cry out for a defendant's testimony, such as sexual assault cases where consent is a key question.

Lawyers also approach cases differently depending on whether there is a jury, said Stuesser. In a jury trial, the Crown and judge can't make a negative comment if a defendant doesn't testify. But if it's a judge alone, they can consider the decision in limited circumstances where "the facts are such that call for an overwhelming response from the accused."Rest of Article. . . [Mark Godsey]

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/crimprof_blog/2006/08/crimprof_lee_st.html

CrimProfs | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00d835678b3769e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference CrimProf Lee Stuesser Discusses the Defendant Testimony Decision:

Comments

Post a comment