CrimProf Blog

Editor: Kevin Cole
Univ. of San Diego School of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Friday, January 14, 2005

Florida Supreme Court Considers Narcotics Canine Reliability

Drug_dogI always tell my Criminal Procedure class that narcotics-sniffing dogs should be subjected to the same 4th Amemdment reliability standards as other "tipsters."  A dog who has consistently falsely alerted in the past should be considered like an informant whose tips have repeatedly not panned out.  The Supreme Court of Florida is considering this issue currently, as a defendant is arguing that the narcotics that a canine named "Razor" found on him should be suppressed on the ground that Razor has been so unreliable in the past that his "alert" with respect to the defendant did not give rise to probable cause for the search.  Currently, no national standards exist to measure canine competence.  More . . .   [Mark Godsey]

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/crimprof_blog/2005/01/florida_supreme.html

Search and Seizure | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00d83421c3aa53ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Florida Supreme Court Considers Narcotics Canine Reliability:

» Fla. High Court Considers Drug Sniffs from TalkLeft: The Politics of Crime
The Florida Supreme Court is weighing a challenge to the reliability of a drug-detecting dog. CrimProf blog aptly notes: I always tell my Criminal Procedure class that narcotics-sniffing dogs should be subjected to the same 4th Amemdment reliability st... [Read More]

Tracked on Jan 13, 2005 10:31:27 PM

Comments

Post a comment