December 13, 2004
New Fourth Amendment Decision From Supreme Court
Today the Supreme Court decided Devenpeck v. Alford, No. 03-710. Holding: "A warrantless arrest is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment if the arresting officer has probable cause to believe a crime has been or is being committed, even if the offense for which probable cause exists is not "closely related" to the offense the arresting officer identifies at the time of arrest." [Mark Godsey]
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference New Fourth Amendment Decision From Supreme Court:
» Doesn't Bode Well For Barlow from Leah Guildenstern
Or for us....Back in this post I point to Barlow's post about him being arrested on the basis of a cause-less search his luggage that has been granted to the TSA for the purpose of searching for explosives. [Read More]
Tracked on Dec 16, 2004 1:00:10 PM
Devenpeck is distrubing. Only this Court would hold that a police officer need not know why he is arresting someone, if a hypothetical reasonable police officer would have had probable cause to make the arrest.
As a private citizen I must know the law or face criminal liability. The police can plead ignorance of the law to escape the much less daunting prospect of civil liability.
Still, the Court won't allow regular joes to assert mistake of fact or law as a defense to a crime.
I guess protecting the bottom line of local governments is more constitutionally significant than keeping a citizen who acts in good faith out of prison.
Posted by: Mike | Dec 13, 2004 10:23:29 AM