ContractsProf Blog

Editor: Myanna Dellinger
University of South Dakota School of Law

Monday, July 10, 2017

Who Typed What Where, and Does That Matter?

When I teach my students rules of construction and we talk about contra proforentem, I feel like the standard examples I use with them are insurance contracts, where it's easy to identify who the drafter is. A recent case out of Indiana, Song v. Iatarola, Court of Appeals Case No. 64A03-1609-PL-2094 (thank to D.C. Toedt for the new non-paywall link!), involved an actual discussion of who was the "drafter" in a situation where both parties had input in the contract. The Iatarolas seemed to try to argue that Song should be considered the drafter and have the contract construed against him because he was the one who typed it into Microsoft Word. The court pointed out, though, that the rule of construction is about independent drafting, not a situation where both parties contributed to the contractual terms. Who physically types the contract up means nothing if both parties have helped to decide on the terms being typed up. I have never thought to discuss that with my students, but I think I might bring it up, just to be clear on what the rule is talking about. 

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/contractsprof_blog/2017/07/who-typed-what-where-and-does-that-matter.html

Commentary, Law Schools, Recent Cases, True Contracts | Permalink

Comments

Non-paywall version: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12412225296648026700

Posted by: D. C. Toedt | Jul 10, 2017 12:00:23 PM

Thanks!

Posted by: Stacey | Jul 11, 2017 6:00:00 PM

Post a comment

If you do not complete your comment within 15 minutes, it will be lost. For longer comments, you may want to draft them in Word or another program and then copy them into this comment box.