ContractsProf Blog

Editor: D. A. Jeremy Telman
Valparaiso Univ. Law School

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Friday, January 31, 2014

Sperm Donor Ordered to Pay Child Support Despite Agreement

I like to remind my 1Ls Contracts students that a contract is private law between two parties, but it doesn't override public law.  This story is last week's news, but I thought I'd blog about it anyway because it provides a pretty good example of this point.  In 2009, William Marotta responded to a Craigslist ad posted by two women for a sperm donor.  All three parties agreed - and signed an agreement to the effect - that Marotta waived his parental rights and responsibilities.  The Kansas Department for Children and Families sought to have Marotta declared the father and responsible for payments of $6,000 that the state had already paid and for future child support. 

Unfortunately for Marotta, a Kansas state statute requires a physician to perform the artificial insemination procedure.  The Shawnee County District Court Judge Mary Mattivi ruled that because the parties "failed to conform to the statutory requirements of the Kansas Parentage Act in not enlisting a licensed physician...the parties' self-designation of (Marotta) as a sperm donor is insufficient to relieve (Marotta) of parental rights and responsibilities."

Note that the couple was not seeking to invalidate the contract - it was the Kansas state agency. 

It's unclear whether the parties will appeal.

 

[Nancy Kim]

 

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/contractsprof_blog/2014/01/sperm-donor-ordered-to-pay-child-support-despite-agreement.html

Current Affairs, In the News, Miscellaneous, True Contracts | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef01a73d6bd1a7970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Sperm Donor Ordered to Pay Child Support Despite Agreement:

Comments

Post a comment