ContractsProf Blog

Editor: D. A. Jeremy Telman
Valparaiso Univ. Law School

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Monday, December 10, 2012

Larry Cunningham on Nitro-Lift

CunninghamA few weeks ago, we noted the Supreme Court's decision in Nitro-Lift Technologies L.L.C. v. Howard.

Over on Concurring Opinions, Larry Cunningham has a far stronger response to the decision, noting especially that there were no dissents from the Supreme Court's per curam decision.  He calls for Congress to sort out the robes:

In numerous past SCOTUS cases, dissenting opinions were routinely filed exposing the flaws in the Court’s jurisprudence. The recent per curium opinion may signal capitulation, indicating that there are no longer any Justices prepared to object to these mistakes. That defeat means it is clearly time for Congress to rein the Court in. It should make it clear that state courts are responsible for developing and applying state contract law, not SCOTUS, federal courts or private arbitrators.

There is a lively comment section following Larry's post.

[JT]

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/contractsprof_blog/2012/12/larry-cunningham-on-nitro-lift.html

Commentary, Recent Cases, Weblogs | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef017ee61e38fd970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Larry Cunningham on Nitro-Lift:

Comments

Post a comment