ContractsProf Blog

Editor: D. A. Jeremy Telman
Valparaiso Univ. Law School

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Friday, May 20, 2011

Katy Perry's 45-page Contract Rider

We love celebrity contract riders here at ContractsProf blog.  Excerpts of Katy Perry's 45-page rider are available at thesmokinggun.com.  (If you don't know who Katy Perry is, you are reading too much of this blog and instead you could have learned that California Girls are scantily glad, wear stilettos on the beach and are, therefore, unforgettable.)  

Highlights of the rider include a ban on carnations, a 23-point "principle driver policy" for chauffeurs, and the requirement of a spacious dressing room "piped or draped in cream or soft pink."

Take that Van Halen!

[Meredith R. Miller] 

May 20, 2011 in Celebrity Contracts, True Contracts | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)

Wednesday, May 18, 2011

New in Print (or Online)

Pile of Books Brian H. Bix, Mahr Agreement, Contracting in the Shadow of Family Law (and Religious Law) -- A Comment on Oman's Article, 1 Wake Forest L. Rev. Online 61 (2011)

Scott J. Burnham, Blood Does Not a Contract Make: A Response to Professor Nancy Kim, 1 Wake Forest L. Rev. Online 49 (2011)

Adam Candeub, Contract, Warranty and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, 46 Wake Forest L. Rev. 45 (2011)

David G. Epstein, Response to Reasonable Expectations in Sociocultural Context, 1 Wake Forest L. Rev. Online 54 (2011) 

Tim Stretton, Contract, Debt Litigation and Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice, 31 Adelaide Law Review (2010) (Australia) 

[JT]

May 18, 2011 in Recent Scholarship | Permalink | TrackBack (0)

Tuesday, May 17, 2011

Weekly Top Ten from the Social Science Research Network

SSRN RECENT HITS (for all papers announced in the last 60 days) 
TOP 10 Papers for Journal of Contracts & Commercial Law eJournal  

March 17, 2011 to May 16, 2011

RankDownloadsPaper Title
1 1140 Keynote Address – Identifying and Managing Systemic Risk: An Assessment of Our Progress 
Steven L. Schwarcz
2 241 FCPA Sanctions: Too Big to Debar? 
Drury D. StevensonNicholas J. Wagone
3 228 Contract is Not Promise; Contract is Consent 
Randy E. Barnett
4 227 A Random Walk: The Federal Circuit’s 2010 Government Contracts Decisions 
Steven L. Schoone
5 213 Introduction, Rehabilitating Lochner: Defending Individual Rights Against Progressive Reform 
David Bernstein,
6 186 Choice of Court Agreements, Coordination of Proceedings and Provisional Measures in the Reform of the Brussels I Regulation 
Christian A. Heinze
7 154 The Morality of Jingle Mail: Moral Myths about Strategic Default 
Curtis Bridgeman
8 136 Privacy Law Fundamentals 
Daniel J. SolovePaul M. Schwartz
George Washington University Law 
9 136 The Honor of Private Law 
Nathan B. Oman,
10 114 Managing Moral Risk in Contract 
Aditi Bagchi

RECENT HITS (for all papers announced in the last 60 days) 
TOP 10 Papers for Journal of LSN: Contracts (Topic)  

March 18, 2011 to May 17, 2011

RankDownloadsPaper Title
1 229 Contract is Not Promise; Contract is Consent 
Randy E. Barnett,
2 109 The Myth of Efficient Breach: New Defenses of the Expectation Interest 
Daniel MarkovitsAlan Schwartz
3 103 Digital Evolution in Law School Course Books: Trade-Offs, Opportunities, and Vigilance 
Lawrence A. Cunningham
4 62 Delaware Dissolves the Glue of Capitalism: Exonerating from Claims of Incompetence Those Who Manage Other People’s Money 
Daniel S. Kleinberger
5 51 Gambling by Another Name? The Challenge of Purely Speculative Derivatives 
Timothy E. Lynch,
6 43 Off Contract Harms: The Real Effect of Liberal Rescission Rights on Contract Price 
Michael Aikins
7 38 Equal Opportunity for Arbitration 
Hiro N. Aragaki
8 38 The Sacred and the Profane Contracts Machine: The Complex Morality of Contract Law in Action 
Jean Brauche
9 34 Beyond the Inevitable and Inadequate Regulation of Bankers: A Comment on Painter 
Lyman Johnson
10 34 The Promise Principle and Contract Interpretation 
Juliet P. Kostritsky

 

[JT]

May 17, 2011 in Recent Scholarship | Permalink | TrackBack (0)

Monday, May 16, 2011

SCOTUS Decides Schindler v. U.S. ex rel. Kirk

We blogged about this case one year ago when the Second Circuit ruled in favor of Mr. Kirk.  Here's how we described the case back then:

Daniel Kirk, a Vietnam War veteran, worked at Millar Elevator Industries beginning in the late 70s.  In 2002, Millar's operations were integrated into those of the Schindler Elevator Company.  In 2003, Millar was demoted and resigned.  Eight months later, Kirk sued, alleging that he had been fired in violation of VEVRAA, the VIetnam Era Veterans Readjustment Assistance Act.  That claim was dismissed and the dismissal was affirmed last year.  

Supreme_Court_US_2010 Meanwhile, Kirk brought suit under the False Claim Act in the name of the U.S. government.   In 2007, the government elected not to intervene and Kirk pursued his claim as a relator.  His suit alleged that Schindler had entered into hundreds of contracts subject to VEVRAA requirements but that Schindler had failed to comply with those requirements.  Among other claims, Kirk alleged that Schindler failed to submit required VETS-100 reports in some years and had filed false VETS-100 forms in others.   The district court dismissed the action finding, among other things, that the claim was bared under the FCA, 31 U.S.C. s. 3730(e)(4), which provides that information that has been publicly disclosed cannot be a basis for a FCA claim.  The information at issue here related to the allegedly missing and/or falsified VETS-100 forms that Mr. Kirk had discovered through FOIA requests.  

The relevant section of the FCA provides:

No court shall have jurisdiction over an action under this section based upon the public disclosure of allegations or transactions in a criminal, civil, or administrative hearing, in a congressional, administrative, or Government Accounting Office report, hearing, audit, or investigation, or from the news media, unless the action is brought by the Attorney General or the person bringing the action is an original source of the information. 

The Second Circuit vacated and remanded. There was no question that Mr. Kirk was not the original source of the information, so the only question whether a FOIA request counts as "public disclosure" for the purposes of the statute.  The Third Circuit answered that question in the affirmative.  The Ninth Circuit concluded that only a FOIA request that results in the production of an "enumerated source;" that is, one of the types of sources expressly named in the statute, creates a jurisdictional bar to an FCA claim.  The Second CIrcuit followed the Ninth.  It was supported in its position by the U.S. government as amicus curiae.

At that time, we suggested that the rules regulating when the False Claim Act's jurisdictional bar precludes qui tam actions are complicated.  Mr. Kirk, the relator in the case, commented that, in his view, they are not complicated at all and the Second Circuit was obviously correct in its finding that the jurisdictional bar did not preclude his claim.

The Supreme Court split along party lines 5-3 (Justice Kagan did not participate) and reversed, with Justice Thomas writing for the majority.  The majority held that a government agency's response to a FOIA request constitutes a "report" and thus falls within the FCA's jurisdictional bar.  Justice Ginsburg wrote a short dissent, basically endorsing the Second Circuit's approach.  The opinion can be found here.  

SCOTUSblog provides coverage here.  

[JT]

May 16, 2011 in About this Blog, Government Contracting, Recent Cases | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Law and Ethics in International Transactions

Early in my practice career, I did a fair amount of white collar criminal work, usually involving contracts with the U.S. government. Later I spent a good deal of time doing internal investigations on behalf of clients who had stumbled over some in-house wrongdoing, to help determine what steps ought to be taken. I had the good luck to be mentored by (and later be a partner of) one of the most ethically upright and honest lawyers I've ever known. And I've always remembered his advice. "At the end of the day," he said, "if somebody is going to have to go to jail, make sure it's your client . . . not you." He was firmly of the opinion that the Allenwood Federal Correctional Complex (aka "Club Fed") was despite the name a much better place to visit than to live.

Now Mike Ross (left), another one of my former colleagues at my old firm -- who went on to a very successful career as an in-house counsel and then a lecturer at UVA and Berkeley -- has taken up the thread with a new book, Ethics and Integrity in Law and Business, out soon from Lexis/Nexis. It's a Professional Responsibility book that seems to be specially aimed at the perils transactioinal and other business lawyers face. I don't have a link yet, but I'm told you can get a review copyon its release in August through your friendly neighborhood Lexis/Nexis rep.

FGS

May 16, 2011 | Permalink | TrackBack (0)