ContractsProf Blog

Editor: D. A. Jeremy Telman
Valparaiso Univ. Law School

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Monday, April 2, 2007

Limerick of the Week

Winternitz v. Summit Hills is a useful case for illustrating why the difference between law and equity might still matter in a modern court.  It is also a useful case for illustrating why tort law might matter in a modern court, if anyone is interested in such things.  The interplay between the real and the imaginary in the case gives it the feel of a Dr. Seuss book, and so this Limerick has a bit of a Seussical feel to it:

Winternitz v. Summit Hills

Hard cases result in bad laws.
But there's a solution because
The court can resort
To a sort of a tort
To remedy equity's flaws.

[Jeremy Telman]

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/contractsprof_blog/2007/04/limerick_of_the.html

Famous Cases, Limericks, Teaching | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00d83543468153ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Limerick of the Week:

Comments

Post a comment