ContractsProf Blog

Editor: Myanna Dellinger
University of South Dakota School of Law

Monday, April 2, 2007

Limerick of the Week

Winternitz v. Summit Hills is a useful case for illustrating why the difference between law and equity might still matter in a modern court.  It is also a useful case for illustrating why tort law might matter in a modern court, if anyone is interested in such things.  The interplay between the real and the imaginary in the case gives it the feel of a Dr. Seuss book, and so this Limerick has a bit of a Seussical feel to it:

Winternitz v. Summit Hills

Hard cases result in bad laws.
But there's a solution because
The court can resort
To a sort of a tort
To remedy equity's flaws.

[Jeremy Telman]

Famous Cases, Limericks, Teaching | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Limerick of the Week:


Post a comment

If you do not complete your comment within 15 minutes, it will be lost. For longer comments, you may want to draft them in Word or another program and then copy them into this comment box.