ContractsProf Blog

Editor: D. A. Jeremy Telman
Valparaiso Univ. Law School

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Wednesday, December 13, 2006

From Socratic Dialogue to Power Point Slide

Here is a link to an interesting article in the NY Times concerning the shift from socratic dialogue to "didactic lecture" in medical education. According to the article, the patient-focused method is being replaced with lectures concerning biomedical research.

[Meredith R. Miller]

December 13, 2006 in Teaching | Permalink | TrackBack (0)

Tuesday, December 12, 2006

The New Melvin Eisenberg Article Is Here!!

Mlr The latest issue of the Michigan Law Review  (the picture at left is not the latest issue) sports Melvin Eisenberg's "The Disgorgement Interest in Contract Law."  Do you remember the scene from Steve Martin's The Jerk when the new phonebooks arrive and Steve Martin gets terribly excited?  That scene approximates my joy at discovering a new article by Eisenberg.  For some reason, this one did not first circulate on SSRN, so it is a happy surprise.  An edited version of the abstract appears below:

Restatement Second of Contracts provided that contract law serves to protect one or more of three interests: the expectation interest, the reliance interest, and the restitution interest.  There is, however, a fourth interest that contract law should and does protect: the disgorgement interest, which is the promisee's interest in requiring the promisor to disgorge a gain that was made possible by the promisor's breach, but did not consist of a benefit conferred on the promisor by the promisee.  It is not clear why the Restatement Second excluded the disgorgement interest.  Perhaps the drafters believed that this position was compelled by positive law.  That proposition, however, would have been doubtful even when Restatement Second was published ,and it is clearly wrong today: . . . Alternatively, the drafters of Restatement Second may have believed that the disgorgement interest should not be protected as a normative matter.  That proposition also cannot be supproted.  On the contrary, there are strong efficiency reasons, as well as moral reasons, for protecting the disgorgement interest, because in certain categories of cases, protection of that interest in contract law is necessary to provide efficient incentives ot the promisor, to effectuate contracts., or to prevent unjust enrichment. . . .

The citation for the article is 105 Mich. L. Rev. 559 (2006)

[Jeremy Telman]

December 12, 2006 in Recent Scholarship | Permalink | TrackBack (0)

Monday, December 11, 2006

Limerick of the Week

Once again, I thank Knapp, Crystal and Prince for including Syester v. Banta in their casebook, as I would otherwise never have come across it.  For those unfamiliar, I recommend looking it up, as the facts are terrific.

In the shallow end of the gene pool
Met a widow and a young dancing fool
Who had to teach her for squat
How to waltz and foxtrot
Becasue misleading widows is cruel.

[Jeremy Telman]

December 11, 2006 in Famous Cases, Limericks, Teaching | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)