ContractsProf Blog

Editor: D. A. Jeremy Telman
Valparaiso Univ. Law School

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Tuesday, April 18, 2006

Construction Liability Disclaimer Upheld

United_kingdom_flag_9 A recent British case involving a contractual warranty in a construction case presented a knotty question of interpretation.  In the case, Contractor had a contract with Developer, who in turn had a contract with Tenant.  The Contractor-Developer contract provided:

The Contractor shall owe no duties or have any liability under this deed which are greater or of longer duration in that which it owes to the Developer under the Building Contract.

Contractor’s work was apparently not very good, and Tenant had to do some remedial work.  Developer went bust and owed Contractor more than the amount of the remedial work.  Could Tenant recover from Contractor?

No, said the court.  The point of the clause was to limit Contractor’s liability to the amount of its obligations to the amount it was to get from Developer.  Since it had a set-off against Developer for all claims, it couldn’t be liable to Tenant.

Jeremy Glover of London’s Fenwick Elliott LLP runs down the facts in Will a Warranty Always Enable an Employer to Pursue a Claim Against the Contractor if the Developer Becomes Insolvent?

[Frank Snyder]

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/contractsprof_blog/2006/04/construction_li.html

Commentary, Recent Cases | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00d8356012d469e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Construction Liability Disclaimer Upheld: