ContractsProf Blog

Editor: Myanna Dellinger
University of South Dakota School of Law

Wednesday, November 24, 2004

Cases—Juries—Plaintiff entitled to directed verdict where evidence of breach was uncontested

Texas_flag_1 Where it was uncontested that the defendant cancelled the contract with plaintiff without cause, a jury decision that the defendant had performed all its obligations under the agreement was clearly erroneous and would be reversed, according to the Texas Court of Appeals.

A client retained an adjuster to help negotiate a fire insurance claim.  The client subsequently fired the adjuster, settled the claim, and refused to pay.  The client won a jury verdict, but the court, in an opinion by Judge Linda Reyna Yanez, set it aside, holding that the adjuster was plainly entitled to its fees.

Adjusters & Loss Consultants Group. v. Johnson Int’l Material, Inc., 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 9934 (Corpus Christi, Nov. 10, 2004)

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/contractsprof_blog/2004/11/casesjuriesplai.html

Recent Cases | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00d835409c5369e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Cases—Juries—Plaintiff entitled to directed verdict where evidence of breach was uncontested:

Comments

Post a comment

If you do not complete your comment within 15 minutes, it will be lost. For longer comments, you may want to draft them in Word or another program and then copy them into this comment box.