Monday, August 5, 2013

Third Circuit En Banc: Students Have First Amendment Right to Wear Breast Cancer Bracelets

The students' bracelets proclaimed "I ♥ boobies (KEEP A BREAST)."  The Easton Area School District banned the bracelets as not suitable for school.  In an en banc opinion today in B.H. v. Easton Area School District, the Third Circuit upheld the First Amendment rights of the students, affirming the district judge's injunction against the school.

The bracelets were clearly speech and the school's attempt to ban the expression brought the Supreme Court's student speech cases into play:  Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969), Bethel School District No. 403 v. Fraser (1986), Hazelwood Sch. Dist. v. Kuhlmeier (1988) and Morse v. Frederick (2007). 

Superfan_copy_copy-display
The school district relied most heavily on Fraser, defending the bracelet ban as an exercise of its authority to restrict lewd, vulgar, profane, or plainly offensive student speech allowable under Fraser.  However, in the en banc opinion joined by 9 judges, the Third Circuit held that although under Fraser, "a school may categorically restrict plainly lewd, vulgar, or profane speech that offends for the same reasons obscenity offends,"  Fraser "does not permit a school to categorically restrict ambiguous speech that a reasonable observer could interpret as having a lewd, vulgar, or profane meaning and could plausibly interpret as commenting on a social or political issue."  (emphasis added).

The Third Circuit noted that the Tinker disruption standard remained as a "backstop" to the school's argument, but held that here it was not effective.  Tinker, the court asserted "meant what it said: ―a specific and significant fear of disruption, not just some remote apprehension of disturbance," and in the case of the Easton School District's ban on the bracelets the "record of disruption is even skimpier" than it was in the case of the Des Moines school district's ban on the black armbands at issue in Tinker.

For the 5 dissenting judges,there was some doctrinal disagreement over the controlling rationale of Morse (the "Bong Hits 4 Jesus" case), but the central issue was the applicability of Fraser.  For the dissenters, the balance tips toward deference to the school and the fact that the phrase "I ♥ boobies! not only expresses support for those afflicted with breast cancer, but also conveys a sexual attraction to the female breast," allows the school to ban the bracelets.  This is true even if  "certain facts indicate that a sexual interpretation of the ―I ♥ boobies bracelets may be at the outer edge of how a reasonable observer would interpret speech." 

In a very short separate dissenting opinion, but signed by all 5 dissenters, Judge Greenaway, Jr. makes the point that the majority opinion provides little guidance to school districts. Thus, the "I ♥ boobies" Third Circuit opinion joins the "My Space" off campus school speech Third Circuit en banc opinion in 2011, which provided just a little guidance.  Yet perhaps the guidance is this: school officials seeking to restrict student speech do so at their own peril.

RR
[image via]

More on "Dressing Constitutionally" blog here

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2013/08/third-circuit-en-banc-students-have-first-amendment-right-to-wear-breast-cancer-bracelets.html

Cases and Case Materials, First Amendment, Opinion Analysis, Speech | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0192ac61c7e9970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Third Circuit En Banc: Students Have First Amendment Right to Wear Breast Cancer Bracelets:

Comments

Once again, I am astonished by the activist liberal judges of the federal Court of Appeals, who would permit a suggestion of "sexual attraction to the female breast" to be introduced to schoolchildren. What horrors might follow if young female students became similarly concerned about ovarian cancer? The five dissenters are so on the mark that our courts, guardians of our liberty, must defer to school officials, who only seek to vigilantly root out any possibility that knowledge of "S-E-X" would taint our children.

Posted by: Jeffrey G. Purvis | Aug 6, 2013 8:47:21 AM

Post a comment