Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Raisins Going to the Supreme Court on Takings Clause

Just when it seems as if the "takings clause revolution" is over, it re-emerges.  This time, the property is not a "little pink house," but raisins. 

800px-Raisins_01
The United States Supreme Court has granted certiorari in Horne v. USDA.  As we discussed last year, the Ninth Circuit upheld the constitutionality of a USDA regulatory scheme regarding raisins against a takings clause challenge.  The central requirement at issue mandates that a certain percentage of a raisins be put in "reserve" each year - - - this fluctuates yearly and by controlling raisins on the market is a means of indirectly controlling prices. The Hornes argued that  "the requirement that they contribute a specified percentage of their annual raisin crop to the government-controlled reserve pool constitutes an uncompensated per se taking in violation of the Fifth Amendment."

RR
[image via]

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/11/raisins-going-to-the-supreme-court-.html

Fifth Amendment, Supreme Court (US), Takings Clause | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef017ee57b0cc3970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Raisins Going to the Supreme Court on Takings Clause:

Comments

Post a comment