Tuesday, October 23, 2012

New York Court of Appeals Allows Distinctions Amongst Dance

In a divided opinion today, New York's highest court denied a tax exemption for an adult juice bar in In the Matter of 677 New Loudon v. State of NY Tax Appeals Tribunal.  The juice bar, at which there are dance performances, argued that admission fees should not be taxed under the rules governing a "place of amusement in the state" but included in the exemption for "dramatic or musical arts performances."  The majority rejected this contention in less than 5 pages.

462px-Ernst_Ludwig_Kirchner_Hamburger_Tänzerinnen
In Judge Smith's equally brief dissent, joined by Chief Judge Lippman and Judge Read, the First Amendment aspects of the differential tax are explicitly raised:

Like the majority and the [Tax] Tribunal, I find this particular form of dance unedifying -- indeed, I am stuffy enough to find it distasteful. Perhaps for similar reasons, I do not read Hustler magazine; I would rather read the New Yorker. I would be appalled, however, if the State were to exact from Hustler a tax that the New Yorker did not have to pay, on the ground that what appears in Hustler is insufficiently "cultural and artistic." That sort of discrimination on the basis of content would surely be unconstitutional (see Arkansas Writers' Project, Inc. v Ragland, 481 US 221, 229-230 [1987]). It is not clear to me why the discrimination that the majority approves in this case stands on any firmer constitutional footing.

It is easy to imagine the attorneys for the adult juice bar considering a petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court raising First Amendment claims, although the constitutional status of dancing as expressive speech is not as firmly established as that of newspapers.

RR
[image: Ernst Ludwig Kirchner: Hamburger Tänzerinnen, 1910 via]

 

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/10/new-york-court-of-appeals-allows-distinctions-amongst-dance.html

First Amendment, Opinion Analysis, Speech | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef017c32beddfd970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference New York Court of Appeals Allows Distinctions Amongst Dance:

Comments

Can one infer from this decision that "sin" taxes are unconstitutional?

Posted by: gc_wall | Oct 25, 2012 11:09:40 PM

Post a comment