Wednesday, May 23, 2012

CFP: AALS ConLaw Section

Section on Constitutional Law
Call for Papers for January 2013 AALS Annual Meeting Program:
“Forty Years after Rodriguez, 35 Years after Bakke:
Education, Equality and Fundamental Rights”
 
UnderwoodKeyboardThe Section on Constitutional Law and the Section on Education Law will be holding a joint program at the January 2013 AALS annual meeting. The program topic is “Forty Years after Rodriguez, 35 Years after Bakke: Education, Equality and Fundamental Rights.” The program will be held on Friday, January 4, from 2:00-5:00pm.

The panel organized by the Education Law Section will emphasize school financing, forty years after the Supreme Court held in Rodriguez that there is no fundamental right to education under the U.S. Constitution and that public school funding disparities are not subject to close scrutiny.
 
The Section on Constitutional Law panel will deal primarily with the constitutionality of racial affirmative action in higher education admissions. Among other matters, it will consider the implications of the Court’s grant of review in Fisher v. University of Texas, involving an undergraduate affirmative-action admissions program.

The Section on Constitutional Law invites submission of abstracts (of no more than five pages) for purposes of choosing one speaker for this panel. The speaker who is chosen will be expected to produce a paper that can be posted on the AALS web site prior to the annual meeting and that will be published in the Loyola Law Review.
 
Deadline Date for Submission: August 1, 2012
 
For more information and submission of abstracts, contact Professor Mark S. Scarberry, Pepperdine University School of Law, mark.scarberry AT pepperdine.edu.

RR 

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2012/05/cfp-aals-conlaw-section.html

Affirmative Action, Conferences, Race, Recent Cases, Reconstruction Era Amendments, Scholarship | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0168ebba7b40970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference CFP: AALS ConLaw Section:

Comments

Rodruiguez did not hold that there is no fundamental right to education, it held that there is no fundamental right to an equal education, under circumstances where a minimally adequate education is provided to all children. Whether there is a fundamental right to some education versus no education was not decided. Not much of a difference from how you (or AALS?) characterized the decision, but shouldn't we speak with precision in these matters?

Posted by: Jeffrey G. Purvis | May 24, 2012 7:46:24 AM

Post a comment