« Footnote of the Day: Taxes and Numbers | Main | Footnote of the Day: Plurality Footnote on Habeas for State Prisoners »
April 15, 2011
Voting Restricted to Males for Leadership in Religious Council that Receives State Funding: Constitutional?
Religious communities? Gender? Voting rights? State action?
A host of constitutional law problems are raised by the following:
According to the bylaws of the Crown Heights Jewish Community Council, a social service agency and community pillar that has received millions of dollars in government grants over the years, only those who meet the following requirements can vote for its leadership:
- Jewish and religiously observant residents of Crown Heights
- Married, previously married or at least 30 years old
- Male
Now Eliyahu Federman, a Crown Heights resident and recent law school graduate [of CUNY School of Law], is challenging that last requirement, saying he believes it to be unconstitutional.
The rest of today's NYT story is here.
For ConLawProfs still looking for a challenging exam question, this might be a good place to start.
RR [image: Suffrage Parade in New York City, 1912, via]
April 15, 2011 in Equal Protection, Establishment Clause, First Amendment, Free Exercise Clause, Fundamental Rights, Gender, News, Religion, Teaching Tips | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef014e87d2be85970d
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Voting Restricted to Males for Leadership in Religious Council that Receives State Funding: Constitutional?:
