Sunday, February 6, 2011

Superbowl Stadium: Constitutional Controversies

Some will be watching today's "Superbowl" in the Cowboys Stadium as a sports event, but for constitutional law fans, the 1.3 (or so) billion dollar Stadium is an example of the Fifth Amendment's Taking Clause in action.  First, there is the taking of private property for public use.  In the case of the Cowboys Stadium in Arlington, Texas, the state and local government used eminent domain powers in residential areas.  Second, there is public financing used to support a privately owned by "public use" project, reportedly 3.25 million for the Cowboys Stadium.  In 1999, Professor Dale Rubin named the process a "constitutional disgrace" in his law review article on public aid to professional sports teams.

300px-Cowboys_stadium
More recent articles, many authored by students, explore the Takings Clause problems in building and maintaining a sports stadium.  Two excellent examples are Erin A. Stanton's, Home Team Advantage?: The Taking Of Private Property For Sports Stadiums, 9 N.Y. City L. Rev. 93 (2005), and Peter Asselin's Supporting The Home Team ... In More Ways Than One: An Analysis Of The Public Financing of Philadelphia's New Sports Stadia,  3 Rutgers J. L. & Urb. Pol'y 389 (2006).

RR

[image: Cowboys Stadium via]

 

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2011/02/superbowl-stadium-constitutional-controversies.html

Current Affairs, Fifth Amendment, Scholarship, Takings Clause | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0148c866c217970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Superbowl Stadium: Constitutional Controversies:

Comments

Post a comment