Friday, October 23, 2009

Of Marriage, Monopolies, and Federalism

Do the states have a marriage monopoly?

Picture 2

That's the intriguing question posed by Adam Candeub and Mae Kuykendall, of Michigan State University College of Law, in their new article,  E-Marriage: Breaking the Marriage Monopoly.

They argue:

States inadvertently have created geographic monopolies, requiring each marriage receiving the benefits of their licensing laws to be performed within their borders. This Article's model builds upon established precedents, such as proxy marriage and choice of law for multi-jurisdictional and internet contracts. Using the power of internet communications, our proposal allows states to compete over marriage's procedures and substance. Depending on a couple's preferences for "e-ritual" and a state's desired level of regulatory control, couples could consume the trappings of a traditional ceremony before their friends and family, without travelling to another jurisdiction, perhaps with an officiant presiding on-line from a remote location. More simply, couples could have a complete marriage ceremony in the location of their choice, but would receive a license and file necessary papers with a distant state jurisdiction.

They are publicizing their proposal with a press release here and article soon to be posted on ssrn here (abstract available now).


RR

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/conlaw/2009/10/of-marriage-monopolies-and-federalism.html

Dormant Commerce Clause, Family, Federalism, Scholarship, Sexuality, State Constitutional Law, Travel | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0120a6171af1970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Of Marriage, Monopolies, and Federalism:

Comments

Post a comment