Oregon Law Review Symposium Dedicated to Arthur Miller

Now in print is the Oregon Law Review’s symposium issue: Miller’s Courts: Media, Rules, Policy, and the Future of Access to Justice, covered earlier here. From Mary Kay Kane’s Foreword:

It is most appropriate that the Oregon Law Review is dedicating this Symposium, which is focused on questions relating to access to justice in our civil courts, to Professor Arthur R. Miller, because his entire career has been dedicated to trying to preserve and increase public access to justice. His voice on these questions can be heard in multiple venues. Through his work on rulemaking, legislative drafting, treatise writing, CLE seminars, public television, public speaking, litigation, and writing law review articles and popular books, Arthur Miller has contributed to collaborations among the academy, the bench, and the bar in ways that have enriched both the legal community and civil society in deep and profound ways.

Contents and links below:

• Mary Kay Kane, Foreword, 90 OR. L. REV. 913
• Hon. Jack B. Weinstein, Some Memories of Arthur Miller, 90 OR. L. REV. 919
• Hon. Ronald M. Gould, A Student’s Tribute to Arthur R. Miller, 90 OR. L. REV. 923
• Elizabeth J. Cabraser, The Procedural Vision of Arthur R. Miller: A Practitioner’s Tribute, 90 OR. L. REV. 929
• Alan B. Morrison, A Tribute to Arthur Miller, 90 OR. L. REV. 937
• David Hartman, A Journalist’s Tribute to Arthur R. Miller, 90 OR. L. REV. 941
• Michael Moffitt, Arthur Miller Scared the Hell out of Me, 90 OR. L. REV. 945
• Edward H. Cooper, King Arthur Confronts TwIqy Pleading, 90 OR. L. REV. 955
• Alan B. Morrison, The Necessity of Tradeoffs in a Properly Functioning Civil Procedure System, 90 OR. L. REV. 993
• Hon. Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, Access to Justice Within the Federal Courts—A Ninth Circuit Perspective, 90 OR. L. REV. 1033
• Harvey I. Saferstein and Nathan R. Hamler, Location, Location, Location: A Proposal for Centralized Review of the Now Largely Unreviewable Choice of Venue in Federal Litigation, 90 OR. L. REV. 1065
• Danya Shocair Reda, The Cost-and-Delay Narrative in Civil Justice Reform: Its Fallacies and Functions, 90 OR. L. REV. 1085
• Alex Kozinski and Stephanie Grace, The (Continued) Assault on Privacy: A Timely Book Review Forty Years in the Making, 90 OR. L. REV. 1135
• Brooke D. Coleman, What If?: A Study of Seminal Cases as if Decided Under a Twombly/Iqbal Regime, 90 OR. L. REV. 1147
• Jennifer W. Reynolds, Epilogue: On Miller, Mini-Fujis, and the Meaning of Access, 90 OR. L. REV. 1181

--A