« Symposium announcement: Law and the Morality of Punishing Collective Entities |
| Ford on Peremptory Challenges »
January 20, 2010
Garoupa & Ginsburg on Reputation and the Judiciary
Professor Nuno Garoupa (University of Illinois College of Law) and Professor Tom Ginsburg (University of Chicago Law School) have posted "Reputation, Information and the Organization of the Judiciary" on SSRN. It will be published in the Journal of Comparative Law.
The abstract states:
The reputation of the judiciary, individually or as a whole, determines its status in any given society and its ability to compete effectively for resources. We analyze reputation and make three claims. First, reputation matters. Virtually every theory of judicial power is dependent, ultimately, on perceptions of judges, who famously lack the purse or the sword. Our second claim is that reputation can be divided into individual and collective components. Individual reputation provides information about individual performance whereas collective reputation provides information about the quality of the judiciary in general. We use the economics of team production to analyze the relationship between individual and collective reputation. Third, different legal systems configure institutions in different ways in order to address the problem of information and reputation. This is what we refer to as the industrial organization of the judiciary. The classical understandings of the common law and civil law judiciaries can be seen as sets of linked institutions that are mutually supportive in addressing the problem of information and reputation.
January 20, 2010 in Federal Courts, Recent Scholarship | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Garoupa & Ginsburg on Reputation and the Judiciary:
Post a comment