Sponsored by Wolters Kluwer
Tuesday, December 22, 2009
By Civil Procedure & Federal Courts Blog
Today, the New York Times published this editorial on Iqbal: "Restoring Access to the Courts."
In the News, Twombly/Iqbal | Permalink
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference New York Times Editorial on Iqbal:
According to the New York Times, "[i]n a lamentable 5-to-4 decision earlier this year, the Supreme Court discarded 50 years of legal precedent to make it significantly harder for Americans to assert their legal rights in federal court." This is not my understanding of Twombly and Iqbal.
Twombly, a 7-to-2 decision, written by Justice Souter, "retired" or discarded 50 years of legal precedent. Am I misunderstanding what the Times was referring to?
Posted by: OhioLawDog | Dec 22, 2009 9:17:43 PM
This blog is an Amazon affiliate. Help support Civil Procedure & Federal Courts Blog by making purchases through Amazon links on this site at no cost to you.
PageViewsSince February 19, 2007