Wednesday, December 31, 2008

Offers of Judgment Under FRCP 68: A useful tool, but is this as good as it gets?

Professors Thomas Eaton and Harold S. Lewis, Jr. have posted a second report on the utility of offers of judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68.  In this second report, the Professors discuss some ways in which the rule could be improved.

In very broad terms, we discuss (1) having a separately numbered subdivision of the Rule for cases arising under federal fee-shifting statutes; (2) modifying the terminology of Rule 68 to describe more explicitly the mechanics and sanctions of the Rule; (3) allowing plaintiffs, not just defendants, to initiate offers under a "two-way" rule; (4) devising a set of incentives and sanctions calculated to promote the timely and fair resolution of disputes without unduly threatening either party; and (5) incorporating time frames for making and responding to offers.

You can download the report here.

--Counseller/jtf

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2008/12/professors-thom.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0105369ac5ff970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Offers of Judgment Under FRCP 68: A useful tool, but is this as good as it gets?:

Comments

Post a comment