November 14, 2008
Prof. Michelle S. Simon recently published Defining the Limits of Supplemental Jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. s1367: A Hearty Welcome to Permissive Counterclaims. Click the article title to download the article. The abstract follows:
In 1990, Congress passed 28 U.S.C. j 1367, which combined the judge-made doctrines of ancillary and pendent jurisdiction into a new category, "supplemental jurisdiction. " supplemental jurisdiction allows federal district courts with original jurisdiction to also have jurisdiction over all other claims that form part of the "same case or controversy under Article 1II of the United States Constitution."This Article analyzes supplemental jurisdiction over both permissive and compulsory counterclaims, before and ajier the codz~cationo f$ 1367, by looking at the meaning of "same case or controversy." It then examines two Circuit Court opinions that have held permissive counterclaims may be subject to supplemental jurisdiction as part of the "same case or controversy" as the claim over which the court has original jurisdiction. The author concludes that recent opinions from the Second and Seventh Circuit Courts of Appeal have correctly recognized federal courts' ability to hear permissive counterclaims without independent jurisdiction.
November 14, 2008 | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Supplemental-Jurisdiction Article:
What I am trying to figure out is, if a court has federal question jurisdiction over a permissive counterclaim, do you measure the Article III case or controversy from that claim or from the Plaintiff's original federal question claim?
Posted by: Andrew D | Feb 17, 2009 6:50:31 PM