Monday, August 18, 2008

A new comment to an old post

Back in June, Prof. Counseller wrote about a personal-jurisdiction case styled Phillips v. Prarie Eye Center from the First Circuit.    We recently received the following comment and thought we should bump it to the top in case folks want to respond:

So, I am the Dr. Phillips in the above lawsuit. I am also an attorney. We are preparing an appeal regarding this case to the Supreme Court. I was hoping that someone would be so kind as to share their opinions regarding issues that can be brought up in the brief that will decrease the liklihood that the SC will deny cert. We will certainly include an argument that e-mail should be treated no different than any other from of communication (in person or otherwise). We will also include arguments that I cannot be considered to have reached out in Illinois and all other 50 states by posting my resume on a passive website and that, in fact, Prairie reached out by initating contact with me through an e-mail directed specifically to me. What other strong points do you see?

--RR

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2008/08/a-new-comment-t.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00e5540b4fa18834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A new comment to an old post:

» How to cut down on xanax. from Xanax.
Buy xanax. Lethal blood levels of xanax. Buy 180 xanax. Xanax. Xanax 2mg no prescription. Chemical compounds of xanax. [Read More]

Tracked on Sep 17, 2009 6:13:03 AM

Comments

Post a comment