Sunday, March 16, 2008

The Problem of the Expert Juror

Prof. Paul Kirgis recently posted an article on SSRN titled "The Problem of the Expert Juror."  The article will appear in volume 75 of the Temple Law Review.  The link and abstract appear below:

A fundamental principle of the Anglo-American adjudicative system is that cases must be decided based solely on evidence formally admitted through trial procedures. A jury may not base its decision on information received outside of those formal procedures. Yet jurors bring to the jury room a wealth of education and experience received prior to their service and not subject to the formal rules of proof. That kind of worldly knowledge is a prerequisite to jury service; without a basic level of common knowledge, jurors could not understand the evidence put before them. Problems can arise, however, when jurors bring expertise that exceeds the common knowledge that we expect, and need, them to have. This prospect raises the problem of the expert juror. Especially today, in an evidentiary system remade to require greater scrutiny of expert testimony, courts must be aware of the possibility that jurors will inject unexamined expertise into deliberations, thus subverting the adversarial model of proof we depend on for decisional accuracy and legitimacy. This article examines the problem of juror expertise and suggests an approach for addressing the problem that focuses first on jury selection and second, in extreme cases, on post-verdict review.

Link --RR

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2008/03/the-problem-of.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00e551276b5f8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Problem of the Expert Juror :

» Phentermine adipex. from Adipex.
Adipex. [Read More]

Tracked on Sep 17, 2009 8:23:52 AM

Comments

Post a comment