Friday, March 9, 2007

In case you missed it

Items of interest this week:

  • The Supreme Court decided Sinochem,  unanimously holding that forum non conveniens, like other threshold nonmerits issues, may be resolved before difficult issues of jurisdiction (both of the subject matter and the person).
  • Benjamin Spencer posts a provocative article challenging some basic assumptions about the allocation of power between Congress and the courts. 
  • The 10th Circuit holds that the district court "essentially ceded its duty to conduct factfinding to the advisory jury. As we have held, 'the findings of such a jury are, of course, merely advisory; the trial court must . . . make its own findings and ‘review on appeal is of the findings of the court as if there had been no verdict from an advisory jury.'"

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/2007/03/in_case_you_mis_1.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00d835760ffb69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference In case you missed it:

» China's Economic History And Future In A Nutshell from China Law Blog
When I attended law school, The Nutshell Series of books were popular among us students (and may still be, for all I know). These books would summarize hugely difficult and complex subjects like Constitutional Law, Commercial Law, or Civil Procedure, i... [Read More]

Tracked on Jan 12, 2010 10:21:16 PM

Comments

Post a comment