Civil Rights Law & Policy Blog

Editor: Andrew M. Ironside

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Friday, June 27, 2014

LATimes editorial laments SCOTUS decision to strike down buffer zones around abortion clinics

Yesterday, SCOTUS announced its decision in McCullen v. Coakley striking down Massachusetts' law banning anti-abortion protesters from coming within 35 feet of abortion clinics as violative of the First Amendment. The LATimes Editorial Board isn't pleased. It writes:

The 1994 shootings may have been the impetus for Massachusetts to write its first law on the subject, but the Guttmacher Institute, a research organization that supports the right to abortion, notes that clinics across the country continue to report bombings, vandalism, blockades, arson and violent protests. Just because some opponents of abortion are peaceful doesn't mean women don't need protection from others.

 

You'll hear no argument from us about how vital the right to free speech is. But that does not mean that all other rights must yield to it at all times.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civil_rights/2014/06/latimes-editorial-board-laments-scotus-decision-to-strike-down-buffer-zones-around-abortion-clinics.html

First Amendment, Freedom of Speech | Permalink

Comments

Post a comment