Civil Rights Law & Policy Blog

Editor: Andrew M. Ironside

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Monday, December 23, 2013

Former CIA director: whether NSA's surveillance program has been effective is irrelevant

There's John Yoo, but then there's this guy. As The Atlantic reports:

Michael Morell, the former acting director of the CIA and a member of President Obama's task force on surveillance, said in an interview on Sunday that a controversial telephone data-collection program conducted by the National Security Agency should be expanded to include emails. He also said the program, far from being unnecessary, could prevent the next 9/11.

 

Morell, seeking to correct any misperception that the presidential panel had called for a radical curtailment of NSA programs, said he is in favor of restarting a program that the NSA discontinued in 2011 that involved the collection of "metadata" for internet communications. That program only gets a brief mention in a footnote on page 97 of the task-force report, "Liberty and Security in A Changing World." "I would argue actually that the email data is probably more valuable than the telephony data," Morell told National Journal in a telephone interview. "You can bet that the last thing a smart terrorist is going to do right now is call someone in the United States."

 

Morell also said that while he agreed with the report's conclusion that the telephone data program, conducted under Section 215 of the Patriot Act, made "only a modest contribution to the nation's security" so far, it should be continued under the new safeguards recommended by the panel. "I would argue that what effectiveness we have seen to date is totally irrelevant to how effective it might be in the future," he said. "This program, 215, has the ability to stop the next 9/11 and if you added emails in there it would make it even more effective. Had it been in place in 2000 and 2001, I think that probably 9/11 would not have happened."

Holy crap! According to Morell, questioning whether a controversial government program has been effective is a completely futile exercise. After all, it might work someday.

How can you argue with that? You can't predict the future... Freedom haters!

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civil_rights/2013/12/former-cia-director-whether-nsas-surveillance-program-has-been-effective-is-irrelevant.html

Fourth Amendment | Permalink

Comments

Crap is seldom holy. But the guy is lying about the interception of emails. They do that and have admitted it in other forums or interviews. Your emails are not safe. On the telephone speak in Pig Latin. That makes them yell olyHey apCray.

Posted by: Liberty1st | Dec 24, 2013 9:21:59 AM

Do we really expect Professor Yoo to criticize a law signed by his former boss, President Bush?

Posted by: Eric Sanders | Dec 25, 2013 6:07:01 PM

Post a comment