Chinese Law Prof Blog

Editor: Donald C. Clarke
George Washington University Law School

Friday, September 12, 2008

Tempest in the Beijing Lawyers Association - follow-up

Here's some commentary on my previous post from the very well-informed Sida Liu:

This is a very interesting development indeed. You're right that the BMLA's position is a bit vulnerable. The reason is simply demographic and economic, as I understand it.

Beijing has more lawyers than any other city in the country.  By 2007 Beijing already had more than 15,000 lawyers, and  this number is growing at a speed of about 2,000 lawyers per  year. Every lawyer pays 2,500 yuan annual "membership fee"  to the BMLA. This gives the BMLA about 40 million yuan in  revenue every year. On the other hand, the BMLA has only  about 30-35 regular staff. To spend the money they have  bought floors in a nice office building as office space, sponsored many overseas trips for the leaders of the justice  bureau, BMLA and a small number of leading lawyers, started  to conduct a survey of the Beijing bar every other year, and paid for an annual health examination of all lawyers. But still the money is mostly used in ways that do not necessarily benefit the vast majority of lawyers in the city. The grievance of those "migrant lawyers" who came from  out-of-town places is particularly strong as their practice  is often poorly supported by the firms and the BMLA.

Given this background, it is not surprising that these 35  lawyers can do something like this, with an even more  stunning "cultural revolution"-style response from the BMLA.  My feeling is that the crucial issue now is whether the call  of these 35 lawyers, mostly ordinary practitioners at the  periphery of the bar, could win the support of elite members  of the Beijing bar, many of whom assume positions in the  BMLA.

News - Chinese Law | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Tempest in the Beijing Lawyers Association - follow-up:


Post a comment