Chinese Law Prof Blog

Editor: Donald C. Clarke
George Washington University Law School

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Thursday, November 23, 2006

China's low acquittal rate

In a speech earlier this month, Supreme People's Court president Xiao Yang stated that in the 9-year period from 1997 through 2005, 41,038 criminal defendants had been found innocent, representing 0.66% of the number of persons on whom judgment had been pronounced. [Source] He is not reported to have commented on whether he thought this figure was too high, too low, or just right.

Without information on what kind of cases are brought to trial - information that only in-depth fieldwork would reveal - it's hard to know what to make of this number. It is theoretically possible that doubtful cases are never brought to trial, although recent well publicized cases of miscarriages of justice (for example, here and here) make that hypothesis a bit implausible. But just how implausible is impossible to say.

The acquittal rate in the United States is much higher: in federal courts, a recent study found that the average conviction rate in jury cases was 84%, while judges convicted slightly more than 50% of the time; a quick Google search finds estimates of the overall acquittal rate ranging from 17%
to about 25%. (I have not researched this extensively and would welcome better numbers.)

East Asian countries have much lower acquittal rates. Consider this report on South Korea:

Prosecutors normally indicted only when they accumulated what they considered overwhelming evidence of a suspect's guilt. The courts, historically, were predisposed to accept the allegations of fact in an indictment. This predisposition was reflected in both the low acquittal rate--less than 0.5 percent--in criminal cases and in the frequent verbatim repetition of the indictment as the judgment. The principle of "innocent until proven guilty" applied in practice much more to the pre-indictment investigation than to the actual trial.

The acquittal rate in Japan is less than 1 percent. [Source] (For a good study of the Japanese criminal prosecution system, see David Johnson, The Japanese Way of Justice: Prosecuting Crime in Japan (2002), reviewed here.)

Interestingly, Taiwan's acquittal rate is 12% [source] - lower than the US but still in the same ballpark, while conspicuously higher than that of Japan or South Korea, to whose criminal justice systems its own bears a much higher formal resemblance. Another source reports a somewhat lower rate:

According to statistics released by the Ministry of Justice, the proportion of those released without prosecution is about 20 percent yearly. The conviction rate of those that go to trial is more than 90 percent.

The Dui Hua Foundation has a report here that looks at the issue of Chinese conviction rates in political cases in particular.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/china_law_prof_blog/2006/11/chinas_low_acqu.html

News - Chinese Law | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00d834fea37a69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference China's low acquittal rate:

Comments

Great post. Fascinating stuff.

Posted by: China Law Blog | Nov 26, 2006 9:58:43 PM

These statistics need more context. Leaving aside China's conviction rate, there's still huge variation between Japan (1%) and Taiwan (12%), not to mention the US. What's the explanation for such a difference between two democracies? There are lots of potential explanations: differing measuring standards about conviction rates, different criteria used by prosecutors on when to prosecute, and/or well trained Japanese prosecutors vs. poorly trained Taiwanese prosecutors.

Posted by: Scott Kennedy | Nov 29, 2006 7:08:58 AM

I don't disagree with Scott at all. As I stated, "Without information on what kind of cases are brought to trial - information that only in-depth fieldwork would reveal - it's hard to know what to make of this number." And I don't mean to exclude other types of useful information as well.

Posted by: Don Clarke | Nov 29, 2006 12:40:06 PM

Post a comment