Chinese Law Prof Blog

Editor: Donald C. Clarke
George Washington University Law School

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Monday, December 19, 2005

SPC publishes second five-year plan for court reform

The Supreme People's Court has finally published its second five-year plan for court reform (人民法院第二个五年改革纲要(2004-2008)). This document was reported to have been issued in October; it is dated Oct. 26, and news reports appeared at the time discussing its contents. But the document itself was inexplicably unavailable to those of us who were looking for it; it did not, for example, appear on the SPC's web site. But now we finally have it: click here.

Below are some initial impressions based on a quick reading. I've also included a few queries at the end and would welcome suggested answers. This post is open to comments.

===============================================================================

This is an interesting document with a number of good and specific suggestions and goals that go beyond the platitudes one often sees in these things. A few things that struck me:

1. Death penalty: (a) Hearings (开庭审理) at the second instance as well as the first. (b) All death penalties to be reviewed by Supreme People's Court.

2. Change in function of higher courts: Change from a principle of jurisdiction by importance of case (e.g., amount in controversy) or party to a system of jurisdiction by type of legal principle at stake. Thus, higher courts will not have original jurisdiction in cases where no legal issue of broad significance is at stake.

3. Increase finality of judgments (at least this is how I read Item 9): Bring more order into the system of zaishen (再审).

4. Reform the system of qingshi (请示): If there's an important legal issue at stake that can only be resolved by a higher court, then the lower court (or the parties) should request that the higher court simply take jurisdiction over the whole case and hear it.

5. Reform of adjudication committee: Item 23 seems to contemplate separate ACs for criminal and civil matters. This would seem to mean the end of the AC as a single body with jurisdiction over everything the court does, and would leave the court president as the head (whereas I believe that now, at least in form, the AC as an organ of collective leadership is superior to the president). Kind of a big step.

6. Reform of personnel selection: The document suggests that higher court judges should increasingly be taken from skilled lower court judges and other legally talented people, but it's not specific on how this would happen, since it doesn't recommend changing the basic system of judicial appointment.

7. Reforms in court financing: Here the document is quite specific: it suggests that court finances should be guaranteed at the state level and paid at a level not lower than the provincial treasury. This would make a big difference in the way courts operate if it could be effected.

Something I didn't see: Section 4 on improving the enforcement of  judgments didn't seem to offer very much by way of specifics. Did anyone see something there they found significant?

Questions about obscure (to me) terms:

1. What is 各级人民法院的法官员额比例方案 (Item 36)?

2. What is it talking about in Item 25 when it says 实现司法政务管理的集中化和专门化?

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/china_law_prof_blog/2005/12/spc_published_s.html

News - Chinese Law | Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00d8349bafbf69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference SPC publishes second five-year plan for court reform:

Comments

Some information from Google.

各级人民法院的法官员额比例方案 (Item 36)shall mean the plan on ceiling percentage of judges in the staff of the different levels of courts. This effort purports to control the number of judges. Please see Article 50 of the 中华人民共和国法官法. An interpretation on this Article is available at

About 现司法政务管理的集中化和专门化 in Item 25, I think it shall mean some special staff (instead of simultaneously as judges) will do the administration courts. Judges shall not be involved in the administration work of courts so that they can concentrate on judicial activities.

By the way, I like very much your articles and your blog.

Posted by: Xie | Dec 23, 2005 5:11:05 AM

Is there an english language version of the reform plan? Google only translates half of it.

Posted by: Mike | Jan 14, 2006 11:02:19 AM

Where can I get access to the English version of the Second Five-Year Court Reform Plan?

Posted by: Litong Chen | Mar 19, 2006 8:00:59 PM

Post a comment