Saturday, November 23, 2013

Did Ayn Rand Channel the Secret Law of Attraction?

I was reading the introduction to the 35th anniversary edition of Atlas Shrugged the other day, and a number of quotes taken from Ayn Rand’s related journal entries struck me (bold highlights are mine):

  • I must show in what concrete, specific way the world is moved by the creators.  Exactly how do the second-handers live on the creators. Both in spiritual matters—and (most particularly) in concrete, physical events. (Concentrate on the concrete, physical events—but don’t forget to keep in mind at all times how the physical proceeds from the spiritual.)
  • [I]t is proper for a creator to be optimistic, in the deepest, most basic sense, since the creator believes in a benevolent universe and functions on that premise. But it is an error to extend that optimism to other specific men. First, it’s not necessary, the creator’s life and the nature of the universe do not require it, his life does not depend on others. Second, man is a being with free will; therefore, each man is potentially good or evil, and it’s up to him and only to him (through his reasoning mind) to decide which he wants to be. The decision will affect only him; it is not (and cannot and should not be) the primary concern of any other human being.
  • [A] creator can accomplish anything he wishes—if he functions according to the nature of man, the universe and his own proper morality, that is, if he does not place his wish primarily within others and does not attempt or desire anything that is of a collective nature, anything that concerns others primarily or requires primarily the exercise of the will of others.

To the extent one can sum up the foregoing as asserting that some type of essentially limitless creative power exists within humans, which is exercised via thought or reason, and need not – in fact should not – concern itself with the success or suffering of others, this sounds an awful lot like some of the rhetoric associated with “The Secret” or “The Law of Attraction.”  For those not familiar with the law of attraction, here is an excerpt from a review of “The Secret” that might help (for a version of the law of attraction presented by a disembodied spirit, as channeled by Esther & Jerry Hicks, go here – you might also want to check out Frank Pasquale’s post on the false advertising implications of The Secret here):

Supporters will hail this New Age self-help book on the law of attraction as a groundbreaking and life-changing work, finding validation in its thesis that one's positive thoughts are powerful magnets that attract wealth, health, happiness... and did we mention wealth? Detractors will be appalled by this as well as when the book argues that fleeting negative thoughts are powerful enough to create terminal illness, poverty and even widespread disasters.

I am certainly not the first person to have considered the possible connection between Ayn Rand’s philosophy and the law of attraction.  For other examples, go here (“Homage to Atlas Shrugged & Ayn Rand” page on “Powerful Intentions,” which describes itself as “a unique Law of Attraction Online Community”) or here (“50 Prosperity Classics,” citing Ayn Rand, The Secret, and Esther & Jerry Hicks).  The Atlas Society itself suggests (in a post entitled, "False Beliefs and Practical Guidance"): “If practical advice from ‘law of attraction’ preachers helps you keep focused on your goals, then use it.”

Anyway, I have not spent a lot of time researching this question (readers that have made it this far are likely now thinking either, “good” or “you’ve already spent way too much time on this”), but I would be curious to hear from anyone who knows of some better sources that either associate Ayn Rand with, or distinguish her from, the law of attraction.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/business_law/2013/11/did-ayn-rand-channel-the-secret-law-of-attraction.html

Books, Stefan J. Padfield | Permalink

Comments

Just because she uses the word "creator" does not mean she is saying "magical-thinker" Ayn Rand believed in the power of a logic driven mind. She marveled at the creations which were "real" like buildings or motors. Invented not by sleepy meditation but by experimentation and rigorous adherence to realtiy. Her emphasis on purpose is to discover a moral purpose that fits within reality, not to arbitrarily choose one by a reality-blasting whim. It's easy to tie Ayn rand into the secret because its easy to tie anything into the secret...but that doesn't make it correct.

Posted by: James | Dec 27, 2014 3:30:18 PM

She may didn't know about "law of attraction" in the terminology that we know, but she sure did perceive that there is something that people don't realise. In Atlas Shrugged she wrote, “I do not think that tragedy is our natural fate and I do not live in chronic dread of disaster. It is no happiness, but suffering that I consider unnatural. It is not success, but calamity that I regard as the abnormal exception in Human Life.” This is one, ant there's several other quotes that imply her knowledge and awareness about the power of achievement and creation of the human being. What we call beliefs she calls values, morals or principals, and everything is very accurate. I think that the way she believe is really good and make some great points. Be true to what is and to what you are (but knowing that you can change everything you want), don't try to amuse anyone cause that won't work out (ever). Be modest, do the things you can do now and be fine with it (but never deny your own potential). These beliefs in capacity and in the "good selfishness" that piss people off too much till, and even more, today. People that are emotional miserable can't match with her at all. I only got well in life, really well, after reading her books. Abraham and the other several masters words + her's are a great fit because they vibrational accurate, they talk the same things in different ways to different types of people. It's the same energy, expressing itself in a variety of forms. It's all good.

Posted by: Daniel A.D.S | Feb 23, 2016 8:28:09 PM

Rand had intellectual knowledge of the laws of attraction but failed miserably in her own romantic life.
Her concept of values attracted to values is a lesson which freed me from my ex wife.

Posted by: Jedi Knight | Sep 29, 2016 5:20:42 AM

Post a comment

If you do not complete your comment within 15 minutes, it will be lost. For longer comments, you may want to draft them in Word or another program and then copy them into this comment box.