« CML V, LLC v. Bax: In Defense of (My Read of) DGCL Section 327 | Main | Seattle Law Review's Second Annual Symposium of the Adolf A. Berle, Jr. Center on Corporations, Law & Society »

September 30, 2011

Bank of America: Principles of Government Regulation

Bank of America announced yesterday that it will start charging customers who use their Bank of America debit cards a fee of $5 a month. The New York Times reports that other banks are already testing similar fees. The Dodd-Frank Act restricted the fees that banks may charge merchants for debit-card transactions. Unable to charge merchants more, the banks have turned to the other side of those debit-card transactions, the consumers.

These changes illustrate two principles of government regulation. First, the government cannot legislate costs out of existence. The cost to banks of handling debit card transactions doesn’t go away just because Congress wants it to. And a decision by Congress as to how much debit card transactions should cost doesn’t change the market. If banks can’t charge merchants, they will try to recover from consumers. If the government next limits what banks can charge debit-card consumers, they will try to cover their costs by raising other banking costs. If they can’t do that, bank shareholders will bear the cost.

Second, government regulation often has unintended consequences. I’m pretty sure that whoever came up with the limit on merchant charges didn’t intend for consumers to pay more. But it’s very hard to control how people respond to regulation. It’s like a balloon: squeeze it at one point and it bulges out at another point. And, no matter how hard you try, you can’t legislate to prevent all the possible bulges.

-Steve Bradford

September 30, 2011 in Government and Business, Steve Bradford | Permalink

Comments

True. But the new law forces banks to disclose what the Debit Card was costing merchants, who passed the charge on to all their customers, including those too wise to use the cards. Now card users will pay their own costs, and can make an informed decision whether the convenience is worth the cost--doubtful. With the cost of old-fashioned checks having gone beyond the bounds of reason, perhaps the public will revert to using cash, which typically has a dampening effect on the propensity to spend.

Posted by: Arthur Armstrong | Oct 1, 2011 12:29:22 PM

Post a comment