February 28, 2010
Johnson on Securities Regulation
Jennifer J. Johnson has posted Private Placements: A Regulatory Black Hole on SSRN with the following abstract:
investors, including vulnerable senior citizens, are victimized each
year in dubious securities offerings yet governmental regulators can do
little to intervene. Utilizing the Rule 506 private placement
exemption, promoters today can escape regulatory review by both federal
and state securities officials. While states at one time served as
"local cops on the beat" to protect their citizens, Congress in 1996
preempted state authority, thus creating a situation in which suspect
investment schemes can proliferate below any governmental radar screen.
This article questions the continued wisdom of this regulatory vacuum,
especially in light of recent financial events.
This article reviews the legislative history of this preemptive statute, the National Securities Markets Improvements Act of 1996 (NSMIA), and concludes that the preemption of private placements either resulted from congressional misconceptions, back room politics arising from the
conservative deregulatory agenda of the decade, or both. After analyzing the regulations and the private placement market as it existed in 1996, and as it operates today, the article concludes that NSMIA's cogent preemptive force primarily impacts state authority over the smaller, most risky private placements. Combined with the lack of federal oversight, this statutory preemption creates a regulatory abyss that permits many questionable offerings to take place. In its zeal to deregulate, Congress left many investors with little, if any, governmental protection. This article proposes a
return to state supervision of designated private placements. This modest proposal would foster capital formation, protect investors, and provide for a more rational and efficient legislative framework to regulate private securities transactions.
February 28, 2010 | Permalink